Re: [VOTE] Release Commons-Net 2.1

2010-03-26 Thread Jörg Schaible
rwins...@apache.org wrote: > Hi all > > Here is RC6 for commons::net available for review. Thanks to Niall and > Sebb for helping with some issues around the release. > Binary compatibility has been sacrificed in a few minor cases, however it > is extremely unlikely the affected methods/constant

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons-Net 2.1

2010-03-23 Thread sebb
On 23/03/2010, sebb wrote: > On 22/03/2010, rwins...@apache.org wrote: > > Hi all > > > > Here is RC6 for commons::net available for review. Thanks to Niall and > Sebb for helping with some issues around the release. > > Binary compatibility has been sacrificed in a few minor cases, howev

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons-Net 2.1

2010-03-23 Thread Rory Winston
Thanks! You are absolutely right...the scm block is incorrect...I think the maven release plugin may have rewritten it like this at some stage On 22 Mar 2010, at 07:50, Grzegorz Słowikowski wrote: > Hi > > I think all problems with release process came from bad section in your > pom.xml.

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons-Net 2.1

2010-03-23 Thread Rory Winston
I'm not sure that I'm prepared to block a release for a really really trivial point like this... On 23 Mar 2010, at 22:42, sebb wrote: > On 22/03/2010, rwins...@apache.org wrote: >> Hi all >> >> Here is RC6 for commons::net available for review. Thanks to Niall and Sebb >> for helping with s

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons-Net 2.1

2010-03-23 Thread sebb
On 22/03/2010, rwins...@apache.org wrote: > Hi all > > Here is RC6 for commons::net available for review. Thanks to Niall and Sebb > for helping with some issues around the release. > Binary compatibility has been sacrificed in a few minor cases, however it > is extremely unlikely the affecte

[VOTE] Release Commons-Net 2.1

2010-03-22 Thread rwinston
Hi all Here is RC6 for commons::net available for review. Thanks to Niall and Sebb for helping with some issues around the release. Binary compatibility has been sacrificed in a few minor cases, however it is extremely unlikely the affected methods/constants were ever used so this should not

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons-Net 2.1

2010-03-21 Thread Grzegorz Słowikowski
Hi I think all problems with release process came from bad section in your pom.xml. It's: scm:svn:http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/net/tags/commons-net-2.1 scm:svn:https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/net/tags/commons-net-2.1 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/prop

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons-Net 2.1

2010-03-20 Thread sebb
On 20/03/2010, Niall Pemberton wrote: > Why is Net 2.1 breaking compatibility with Net 2.0? > > http://markmail.org/message/pnfmv75m2muz2pfv > Some of those were fixes I made: Error Removed field KEYSTORE_ALGORITHM org.apache.commons.net.ftp.FTPSClient KEYSTORE_ALGORITHM Error Rem

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons-Net 2.1

2010-03-20 Thread Niall Pemberton
Why is Net 2.1 breaking compatibility with Net 2.0? http://markmail.org/message/pnfmv75m2muz2pfv Niall On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 7:46 AM, wrote: > Hi all > > Here is RC5 for commons::net available for review. Thanks to Niall and Sebb > for helping with some issues around the release. > > Tag: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons-Net 2.1

2010-03-20 Thread sebb
On 20/03/2010, sebb wrote: > On 20/03/2010, rwins...@apache.org wrote: > > Hi all > > > > Here is RC5 for commons::net available for review. Thanks to Niall and > Sebb for helping with some issues around the release. > > > > Tag: > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons-Net 2.1

2010-03-20 Thread sebb
On 20/03/2010, rwins...@apache.org wrote: > Hi all > > Here is RC5 for commons::net available for review. Thanks to Niall and Sebb > for helping with some issues around the release. > > Tag: > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/net/tags/NET_2_1_RC_5/ > > Site: > > http://peopl

[VOTE] Release Commons-Net 2.1

2010-03-20 Thread rwinston
Hi all Here is RC5 for commons::net available for review. Thanks to Niall and Sebb for helping with some issues around the release. Tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/net/tags/NET_2_1_RC_5/ Site: http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/net/2.1/RC5/site/index.html Binaries:

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons-Net 2.1

2009-07-25 Thread James Carman
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote: > > Rory Winston wrote: > > > Hi folks > > > > Fix release for the 2.0 branch. > > > > Binaries/sources etc: > > http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-2.1-RC1/ > > > > Tag: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/net/tags/NET_2_1_R

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons-Net 2.1

2009-07-25 Thread Jörg Schaible
Jörg Schaible wrote: > Rory Winston wrote: > >> Hi folks >> >> Fix release for the 2.0 branch. >> >> Binaries/sources etc: >> http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-2.1-RC1/ >> >> Tag: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/net/tags/NET_2_1_RC1/ >> >> Fixes: >> > https://issues.a

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons-Net 2.1

2009-07-25 Thread Jörg Schaible
Rory Winston wrote: > Hi folks > > Fix release for the 2.0 branch. > > Binaries/sources etc: > http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-2.1-RC1/ > > Tag: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/net/tags/NET_2_1_RC1/ > > Fixes: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.js

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons-Net 2.1

2009-07-21 Thread sebb
On 21/07/2009, Rory Winston wrote: > Hi folks > > Fix release for the 2.0 branch. > > Binaries/sources etc: > http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-2.1-RC1/ There's a pom.asc file, but no .pom nor a pom.md5 commons-net-2.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.tar.bz2.asc fails to validate [commons-net-2.1-SN

[VOTE] Release Commons-Net 2.1

2009-07-20 Thread Rory Winston
Hi folks Fix release for the 2.0 branch. Binaries/sources etc: http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-2.1-RC1/ Tag: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/net/tags/NET_2_1_RC1/ Fixes: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=12310487&fixfor=1231300