> -Original Message-
> From: Julius Davies [mailto:juliusdav...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 5:18 PM
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Codec 1.4 based on RC3
>
> Hi,
>
> Some more API changes attached as pat
I do not mind the current ("old") method names.
Gary
> -Original Message-
> From: Julius Davies [mailto:juliusdav...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 5:18 PM
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Codec 1.4 based on RC3
&g
Hi,
Some more API changes attached as patch to CODEC-86 if anyone is
interested: CODEC-86 - Rename method to Base64.encodeBase64ToString()
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-86
If codec devs prefer the older method names, or don't care, please
just close CODEC-86. Very unimportant. O
Thanks and apologies to everyone - this vote is cancelled because
Codec's API has changed.
Niall
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 1:35 AM, Niall
Pemberton wrote:
> I have prepared a third release candidate for Codec 1.4 following the
> feedback from the first.
>
> [ ] +1 Yes go ahead an release based on RC
+1, source package passes my compiler zoo
Niall Pemberton wrote:
> I have prepared a third release candidate for Codec 1.4 following the
> feedback from the first.
>
> [ ] +1 Yes go ahead an release based on RC3
> [ ] -1 No, because...
>
> The tag for RC3 is here:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 9:33 AM, Gary
Gregory wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Phil Steitz [mailto:phil.ste...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Sunday, August 02, 2009 6:19 PM
>> To: Commons Developers List
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Codec 1.4 based on RC3
>&
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 3:13 AM, Julius Davies wrote:
> Hi, Codec developers,
>
>
> I dropped commons-codec-1.4.jar into IntelliJ 7.0 (my current editor)
> to see how the auto-completion looks. Now I'm having second thoughts
> on two method names for CODEC-59. Here's what it currently looks
> like
Hi, Codec developers,
I dropped commons-codec-1.4.jar into IntelliJ 7.0 (my current editor)
to see how the auto-completion looks. Now I'm having second thoughts
on two method names for CODEC-59. Here's what it currently looks
like:
Base64.encodeBase64String(byte[] binaryData)
Base64.encodeBase
+1
Niall
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 1:35 AM, Niall
Pemberton wrote:
> I have prepared a third release candidate for Codec 1.4 following the
> feedback from the first.
>
> [ ] +1 Yes go ahead an release based on RC3
> [ ] -1 No, because...
>
> The tag for RC3 is here:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/co
> -Original Message-
> From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:niall.pember...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 12:53 PM
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Codec 1.4 based on RC3
>
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Gary
> Gregory wrote:
&g
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Gary
Gregory wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:niall.pember...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 2:38 AM
>> To: Commons Developers List
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Codec 1.4 based on RC
>>
>> Can this go in the next release or do you want to cancel this RC/vote
>> one and include it in the 1.4 release?
>
> I think there are other small issues that have added up that warrant another
> RC. WRT to this ticket in particular, it is partially addressed by the
> DigestUtils fixes I hav
> -Original Message-
> From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:niall.pember...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 2:38 AM
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Codec 1.4 based on RC3
>
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 9:52 AM, Gary
> Gregory wrote:
&g
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 9:52 AM, Gary
Gregory wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Phil Steitz [mailto:phil.ste...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Sunday, August 02, 2009 6:19 PM
>> To: Commons Developers List
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Codec 1.4 base
- "Niall Pemberton" a écrit :
> I have prepared a third release candidate for Codec 1.4 following the
> feedback from the first.
>
> [ ] +1 Yes go ahead an release based on RC3
+1
Luc
> [ ] -1 No, because...
>
> The tag for RC3 is here:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/code
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 9:52 AM, Gary
Gregory wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Phil Steitz [mailto:phil.ste...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Sunday, August 02, 2009 6:19 PM
>> To: Commons Developers List
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Codec 1.4 base
> -Original Message-
> From: Phil Steitz [mailto:phil.ste...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, August 02, 2009 6:19 PM
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Codec 1.4 based on RC3
>
> Niall Pemberton wrote:
> > I have prepared a third rele
> -Original Message-
> From: Phil Steitz [mailto:phil.ste...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, August 02, 2009 6:19 PM
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Codec 1.4 based on RC3
>
> Niall Pemberton wrote:
> > I have prepared a third rele
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Niall
Pemberton wrote:
> I have prepared a third release candidate for Codec 1.4 following the
> feedback from the first.
>
> [X] +1 Yes go ahead an release based on RC3
> [ ] -1 No, because...
>
-Rahul
-
Niall Pemberton wrote:
I have prepared a third release candidate for Codec 1.4 following the
feedback from the first.
[ ] +1 Yes go ahead an release based on RC3
[ ] -1 No, because...
The tag for RC3 is here:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/codec/tags/CODEC_1_4_RC3/
The release art
I have prepared a third release candidate for Codec 1.4 following the
feedback from the first.
[ ] +1 Yes go ahead an release based on RC3
[ ] -1 No, because...
The tag for RC3 is here:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/codec/tags/CODEC_1_4_RC3/
The release artefacts are here
http://pe
21 matches
Mail list logo
