Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.1 based on RC1

2009-11-09 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 3:24 AM, Rahul Akolkar > wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Niall Pemberton >> wrote: >>> We have fixed a number of bugs since BeanUtils 1.8.0 was released a >>> year ago and I'd like to release BeanUtils 1

Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.1 based on RC1

2009-11-09 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 3:24 AM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Niall Pemberton > wrote: >> We have fixed a number of bugs since BeanUtils 1.8.0 was released a >> year ago and I'd like to release BeanUtils 1.8.1 >> >> [X] +1 Yes go ahead an release based on RC1 >> [ ] -1

Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.1 based on RC1

2009-10-16 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 8:18 AM, Jörg Schaible wrote: > Niall Pemberton wrote at Montag, 12. Oktober 2009 23:33: > >> On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Oliver Heger >> wrote: >>> Are these issues release blockers? >>> >>> I'd say if the 1.8.0 release had the same issues, they are not. Otherwise >>

Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.1 based on RC1

2009-10-14 Thread Jörg Schaible
Niall Pemberton wrote at Montag, 12. Oktober 2009 23:33: > On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Oliver Heger > wrote: >> Are these issues release blockers? >> >> I'd say if the 1.8.0 release had the same issues, they are not. Otherwise >> they should probably be investigated. > > I just tested with

Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.1 based on RC1

2009-10-13 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > We have fixed a number of bugs since BeanUtils 1.8.0 was released a > year ago and I'd like to release BeanUtils 1.8.1 > > [X] +1 Yes go ahead an release based on RC1 > [ ] -1 No, because... > Nits include release notes formatting (line w

Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.1 based on RC1

2009-10-12 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Oliver Heger wrote: > Are these issues release blockers? > > I'd say if the 1.8.0 release had the same issues, they are not. Otherwise > they should probably be investigated. I just tested with IBM JDK 1.6 using ant (m2 doesn't work for me with that JDK) and the s

Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.1 based on RC1

2009-10-12 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Oliver Heger wrote: > Are these issues release blockers? > > I'd say if the 1.8.0 release had the same issues, they are not. Otherwise > they should probably be investigated. > Yup, will look over the bits if this vote is still active. -Rahul -

Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.1 based on RC1

2009-10-12 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 11:37 PM, sebb wrote: > On 08/10/2009, Niall Pemberton wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 11:13 PM, sebb wrote: >>  > On 08/10/2009, Niall Pemberton wrote: >>  > >>  > <...> >>  > >>  >> This test was copied from MemoryLeakTestCase and the same problem >>  >>  occurred for

Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.1 based on RC1

2009-10-10 Thread Oliver Heger
Are these issues release blockers? I'd say if the 1.8.0 release had the same issues, they are not. Otherwise they should probably be investigated. Oliver Niall Pemberton schrieb: Hi Jörg, Thanks for testing, comments inline... Niall On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote: H

Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.1 based on RC1

2009-10-09 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Niall, Jörg Schaible wrote: > Niall Pemberton wrote at Freitag, 9. Oktober 2009 00:03: > >> Hi Jörg, >> >> Thanks for testing, comments inline... >> > > [snip] > >>> >>> Issues with Sun JDK 1.3.1: >>> == >>> >>> Source compilable, but a lot of tests fail. >> >> Al

Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.1 based on RC1

2009-10-09 Thread sebb
On 09/10/2009, Jörg Schaible wrote: > sebb wrote at Freitag, 9. Oktober 2009 00:13: > > > > On 08/10/2009, Niall Pemberton wrote: > > > > <...> > > > >> This test was copied from MemoryLeakTestCase and the same problem > >> occurred for BeanUtils 1.8.0 when you tested with maven1 and IBM J

Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.1 based on RC1

2009-10-08 Thread Jörg Schaible
Niall Pemberton wrote at Freitag, 9. Oktober 2009 00:03: > Hi Jörg, > > Thanks for testing, comments inline... > [snip] >> >> Issues with Sun JDK 1.3.1: >> == >> >> Source compilable, but a lot of tests fail. > > All the tests pass for me - I was using Ant 1.7.1 and Su

Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.1 based on RC1

2009-10-08 Thread Jörg Schaible
sebb wrote at Freitag, 9. Oktober 2009 00:13: > On 08/10/2009, Niall Pemberton wrote: > > <...> > >> This test was copied from MemoryLeakTestCase and the same problem >> occurred for BeanUtils 1.8.0 when you tested with maven1 and IBM JDKs. >> Would be nice to get these tests working (wonder

Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.1 based on RC1

2009-10-08 Thread sebb
On 08/10/2009, Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 11:13 PM, sebb wrote: > > On 08/10/2009, Niall Pemberton wrote: > > > > <...> > > > >> This test was copied from MemoryLeakTestCase and the same problem > >> occurred for BeanUtils 1.8.0 when you tested with maven1 and IBM JDK

Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.1 based on RC1

2009-10-08 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 11:13 PM, sebb wrote: > On 08/10/2009, Niall Pemberton wrote: > > <...> > >> This test was copied from MemoryLeakTestCase and the same problem >>  occurred for BeanUtils 1.8.0 when you tested with maven1 and IBM JDKs. >>  Would be nice to get these tests working (wonder if

Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.1 based on RC1

2009-10-08 Thread sebb
On 08/10/2009, Niall Pemberton wrote: <...> > This test was copied from MemoryLeakTestCase and the same problem > occurred for BeanUtils 1.8.0 when you tested with maven1 and IBM JDKs. > Would be nice to get these tests working (wonder if they work with IBM > JDK and ant, rather than maven1)

Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.1 based on RC1

2009-10-08 Thread Niall Pemberton
Hi Jörg, Thanks for testing, comments inline... Niall On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote: > Hi Niall, > > Niall Pemberton wrote: > >> We have fixed a number of bugs since BeanUtils 1.8.0 was released a >> year ago and I'd like to release BeanUtils 1.8.1 >> >> [ ] +1 Yes go ahea

Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.1 based on RC1

2009-10-08 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Niall, Niall Pemberton wrote: > We have fixed a number of bugs since BeanUtils 1.8.0 was released a > year ago and I'd like to release BeanUtils 1.8.1 > > [ ] +1 Yes go ahead an release based on RC1 > [ ] -1 No, because... > > BeanUtils 1.8.1 RC1 is available for review here: > http://pe

[VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.1 based on RC1

2009-10-08 Thread Niall Pemberton
We have fixed a number of bugs since BeanUtils 1.8.0 was released a year ago and I'd like to release BeanUtils 1.8.1 [ ] +1 Yes go ahead an release based on RC1 [ ] -1 No, because... BeanUtils 1.8.1 RC1 is available for review here: http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.1-rc1/ Detai