Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.0 based on RC3

2008-09-01 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Niall, thank you for your help! Best regards, Simone 2008/9/1 Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 8:06 AM, Simone Tripodi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi folks, >> congratulations for this release >> I just would like to know when the artifacts will be available o

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.0 based on RC3

2008-09-01 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 8:06 AM, Simone Tripodi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi folks, > congratulations for this release > I just would like to know when the artifacts will be available on the > central maven repository. Looks like they are there now. Niall > Thanks in advance, best regards,

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.0 based on RC3

2008-09-01 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi folks, congratulations for this release I just would like to know when the artifacts will be available on the central maven repository. Thanks in advance, best regards, Simone 2008/8/31 Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > This vote has passed with six +1 votes from the following people:

[RESULT][VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.0 based on RC3

2008-08-31 Thread Niall Pemberton
This vote has passed with six +1 votes from the following people: Jörg Schaible Niall Pemberton Luc Maisonobe Paul Benedict James Carman Oliver Heger Thanks to everyone. Niall On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 4:37 PM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > BeanUtils 1.8.0 RC3 is available for revi

Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.0 based on RC3

2008-08-30 Thread Oliver Heger
+1 The only (very minor) inconsistency I found is in the manifests of the jars: Only the main beanutils jar contains the entries for OSGI; they are lacking in the core and the bean-collection jar. Oliver Niall Pemberton schrieb: BeanUtils 1.8.0 RC3 is available for review here: http://peopl

Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.0 based on RC3

2008-08-29 Thread James Carman
+1 (binding) On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Luc Maisonobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Niall Pemberton a écrit : >> BeanUtils 1.8.0 RC3 is available for review here: >> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.0-rc3/ > > +1 > > Luc > >> >> I have tested this with JDK 1.3, 1.4, 1.5 and 1.6.

Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.0 based on RC3

2008-08-29 Thread Paul Benedict
+1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.0 based on RC3

2008-08-29 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 8:12 PM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Niall Pemberton > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 7:13 PM, James Carman >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Have we addressed the clirr errors that show up in the report?

Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.0 based on RC3

2008-08-29 Thread James Carman
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 7:13 PM, James Carman > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Have we addressed the clirr errors that show up in the report? > > The clirr errors shown are only vs the 1.8.0-BETA release and the > consensu

Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.0 based on RC3

2008-08-29 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 7:13 PM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Have we addressed the clirr errors that show up in the report? The clirr errors shown are only vs the 1.8.0-BETA release and the consensus was it was OK to break compatibility with a beta version: http://commons.markmail.o

Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.0 based on RC3

2008-08-29 Thread James Carman
Have we addressed the clirr errors that show up in the report? There are some methods (MethodUtils.setCacheMethod) that clirr reports as being added, yet they don't have a @since tag. On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Luc Maisonobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Niall Pemberton a écrit : >> BeanUti

Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.0 based on RC3

2008-08-29 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Niall Pemberton a écrit : > BeanUtils 1.8.0 RC3 is available for review here: > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.0-rc3/ +1 Luc > > I have tested this with JDK 1.3, 1.4, 1.5 and 1.6. This RC is built with JDK > 1.5 > (building with JDK 1.4, has the following problem: > http://com

Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.0 based on RC3

2008-08-29 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 10:22 AM, Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1, JRockit can now run the tests Great, thanks Jörg +1 from me as well Niall > Niall Pemberton wrote: > >> BeanUtils 1.8.0 RC3 is available for review here: >> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.0-rc3/ >>

Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.0 based on RC3

2008-08-29 Thread Jörg Schaible
+1, JRockit can now run the tests Niall Pemberton wrote: > BeanUtils 1.8.0 RC3 is available for review here: > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.0-rc3/ > > I have tested this with JDK 1.3, 1.4, 1.5 and 1.6. This RC is built with > JDK 1.5 (building with JDK 1.4, has the following pr

[VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.8.0 based on RC3

2008-08-28 Thread Niall Pemberton
BeanUtils 1.8.0 RC3 is available for review here: http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.0-rc3/ I have tested this with JDK 1.3, 1.4, 1.5 and 1.6. This RC is built with JDK 1.5 (building with JDK 1.4, has the following problem: http://commons.markmail.org/message/wqqs67eyi6hq3mcq ) The t