On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 2:04 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 23/02/2014 15:15, sebb wrote:
> > On 23 February 2014 14:24, Mark Thomas wrote:
> >> On 23/02/2014 00:10, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> >>
> >>> However, the manifest contains the following line:
> >>>
> >>> Implementation-Build: UNKNOWN_BRANCH@r
On 23/02/2014 15:15, sebb wrote:
> On 23 February 2014 14:24, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 23/02/2014 00:10, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>>
>>> However, the manifest contains the following line:
>>>
>>> Implementation-Build: UNKNOWN_BRANCH@r??; 2014-02-21 14:40:13+
>>>
>>> Maybe we should stop adding
On 23 February 2014 14:24, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 23/02/2014 00:10, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>
>> However, the manifest contains the following line:
>>
>> Implementation-Build: UNKNOWN_BRANCH@r??; 2014-02-21 14:40:13+
>>
>> Maybe we should stop adding it in future, is does not make sense.
Th
On 23/02/2014 00:10, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> However, the manifest contains the following line:
>
> Implementation-Build: UNKNOWN_BRANCH@r??; 2014-02-21 14:40:13+
>
> Maybe we should stop adding it in future, is does not make sense.
+1. Any idea how to stop it?
Mark
--
On 2014-02-21, Mark Thomas wrote:
> The Pool 2.2 RC2 is available for review here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/pool/ (r4457)
> Maven artifacts are here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1009
> Details of changes since 2.1 are in the r
Hi,
+1
builds from source with my compiler zoo.
However, the manifest contains the following line:
Implementation-Build: UNKNOWN_BRANCH@r??; 2014-02-21 14:40:13+
Maybe we should stop adding it in future, is does not make sense.
- Jörg
Mark Thomas wrote:
> 2.2 fixes a few bugs and a
Build with Maven and ant is successful on Windows 8.1 with Java 1.7.
Artifacts and site look good.
+1
One minor point: I noticed that the binary distribution does not contain
the sources and the tests jars. IIRC, they were contained in RC1. Is
this by intension?
Oliver
Am 21.02.2014 17:26, schr
+1
Phil
On 2/21/14, 8:26 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> 2.2 fixes a few bugs and adds a new testOnCreate() feature that is
> required by DBCP 2.
>
> RC2 fixes/improves the following compared to RC1
> - More clarity in release notes and index page on clients not using
> MBean interfaces
> - Refactor mi
+1.
Downloaded src zip, sig ok, hash ok. Builds ok. Reports ok.
Apache Maven 3.1.1 (0728685237757ffbf44136acec0402957f723d9a; 2013-09-17
11:22:22-0400)
Maven home: C:\Java\apache-maven-3.1.1\bin\..
Java version: 1.7.0_51, vendor: Oracle Corporation
Java home: C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.7.0_51\jre
On 21/02/2014 16:26, Mark Thomas wrote:
Unsurprisingly...
> [X] +1 Release these artifacts
> [ ] +0 OK, but...
> [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
> [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-ma
On 21/02/2014 17:17, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Wait a sec, now that pool2 requires Java 6, why are we still shipping our
> own LinkedBlockingDeque instead of using the JRE?
Because we require access to the internals that aren't available if we
use the one from the JRE.
Mark
>
> Gary
>
>
> On Fri,
Wait a sec, now that pool2 requires Java 6, why are we still shipping our
own LinkedBlockingDeque instead of using the JRE?
Gary
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> 2.2 fixes a few bugs and adds a new testOnCreate() feature that is
> required by DBCP 2.
>
> RC2 fixes/improve
2.2 fixes a few bugs and adds a new testOnCreate() feature that is
required by DBCP 2.
RC2 fixes/improves the following compared to RC1
- More clarity in release notes and index page on clients not using
MBean interfaces
- Refactor migration notes so they don't need changing on every release
- U
13 matches
Mail list logo
