On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 12:25 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Hello Gary,
>
> sorry I don't follow. What is wrong with
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/lang/LANG_3_5_RC1 ?
>
My bad, I'll wait for RC2 to review.
Gary
>
> Regards,
> Benedikt
>
--
E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com |
Hello,
this vote is canceled, because the binary distribution contains SNAPSHOT
jars.
Thank you to Oliver Heger who catched this mess :-)
I'll prepare RC2 ASAP.
Benedikt
Benedikt Ritter schrieb am So., 2. Okt. 2016 um
17:23 Uhr:
> Hi,
>
> a long time has passed since we released Apache Commo
Oliver Heger schrieb am Mo., 3. Okt. 2016 um
17:50 Uhr:
> Hi,
>
> the build works fine for me with Java 1.6 and 1.8 on Windows 10, even
> the site build is successful with Java 1.8. The artifacts and the site
> look good.
>
> However, I found a problem with the binary distribution: It contains tw
Hi,
the build works fine for me with Java 1.6 and 1.8 on Windows 10, even
the site build is successful with Java 1.8. The artifacts and the site
look good.
However, I found a problem with the binary distribution: It contains two
spurious jars versioned with 3.5-SNAPSHOT. I think this needs to be
Le 3/10/2016 à 16:36, Benedikt Ritter a écrit :
> This does work for me on Mac OS. Maybe it is related to the UTF-8 changes
> we introduced a few day ago... If this is true, other Windows users should
> have the same problems. Is this a -1 for you?
No this isn't a -1, I don't think site generatio
Hello Emmanuel,
Emmanuel Bourg schrieb am Mo., 3. Okt. 2016 um
13:27 Uhr:
> Hi Benedikt,
>
> I got an error when building the site on Windows 7 with Java 8u101:
>
> [INFO] Cobertura Report generation was successful.
> [INFO] Generating "Checkstyle" report ---
> maven-checkstyle-plu
Hi Benedikt,
I got an error when building the site on Windows 7 with Java 8u101:
[INFO] Cobertura Report generation was successful.
[INFO] Generating "Checkstyle" report ---
maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.15:checkstyle
[INFO] There are 46 errors reported by Checkstyle 6.1.1 with
C:\d
I guess just that its hashes were not in your vote email.
Assuming dist.apache.org revision r16325 (as in your email), sha1 checksums:
9bc28bb93ec7d60f8d21e62c1d6b739d5884fdaa commons-lang3-3.5-bin.zip
5f71d781e86896403ba660a897241d093892322f commons-lang3-3.5-src.zip
bb46fe8a73eb10c9985c83d2d9
Hello Gary,
sorry I don't follow. What is wrong with
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/lang/LANG_3_5_RC1 ?
Regards,
Benedikt
Hi Benedikt,
An RC normally has a sry src and bin zips and tars. I usually test based on
a src zip.
Gary
On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 8:23 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> a long time has passed since we released Apache Commons Lang 3.4. We fixed
> quite a few bugs and introduced some nice new f
Hi,
a long time has passed since we released Apache Commons Lang 3.4. We fixed
quite a few bugs and introduced some nice new features. For this reason,
I'd like to call a vote for releasing Apache Commons Lang 3.5 based on RC1.
Commons Lang 3.5 RC1 is available for review here:
https://dist.apa
11 matches
Mail list logo