Hi,
2015-04-03 14:56 GMT+02:00 Benedikt Ritter :
> Hi all,
>
> We've worked through the issues identified in Commons Lang 3.4 RC1, so I
> would like to call a vote for releasing Commons Lang 3.4 based on RC2.
>
> The changes since RC1 are:
> - Fixed TimeZone related problem in test cases
> - Fixe
My +1 FTR
2015-04-03 14:56 GMT+02:00 Benedikt Ritter :
> Hi all,
>
> We've worked through the issues identified in Commons Lang 3.4 RC1, so I
> would like to call a vote for releasing Commons Lang 3.4 based on RC2.
>
> The changes since RC1 are:
> - Fixed TimeZone related problem in test cases
>
+1, builds from source with my compiler zoo
Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We've worked through the issues identified in Commons Lang 3.4 RC1, so I
> would like to call a vote for releasing Commons Lang 3.4 based on RC2.
>
> The changes since RC1 are:
> - Fixed TimeZone related problem i
+1
Site builds OK from src zip. MD5, ASC OK. Clirr, RAT and other reports OK,
no showstoppers.
Tested with:
Apache Maven 3.2.5 (12a6b3acb947671f09b81f49094c53f426d8cea1;
2014-12-14T09:29:23-08:00)
Maven home: C:\Java\apache-maven-3.2.5
Java version: 1.7.0_75, vendor: Oracle Corporation
Java home:
It looks like 3.4 is about to be released, so your changes should go to 3.5 :-)
B.
Send from my mobile device
> Am 04.04.2015 um 20:42 schrieb Chas Honton :
>
> I have changes which will get tests to pass. Any preference to whether they
> should be added to 3.4 or 3.5?
>
> Chas
>
>> On Apr 4
I have changes which will get tests to pass. Any preference to whether they
should be added to 3.4 or 3.5?
Chas
> On Apr 4, 2015, at 5:01 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>
> 2015-04-04 10:57 GMT+02:00 Duncan Jones :
>
>> +0 (non-binding)
>>
>> Built from zipped sources, digests look fine. JDK 1.8
Maven and ant builds are now successful on Windows 8.1 with Java 1.6 and
1.7. Artifacts and site look good.
+1
Thanks, Benedikt!
Oliver
Am 03.04.2015 um 14:56 schrieb Benedikt Ritter:
> Hi all,
>
> We've worked through the issues identified in Commons Lang 3.4 RC1, so I
> would like to call a
2015-04-04 10:57 GMT+02:00 Duncan Jones :
> +0 (non-binding)
>
> Built from zipped sources, digests look fine. JDK 1.8.0_40 on Win 8.1.
> (Site build fails as mentioned already).
> Site builds fine from JDK 1.7.0_75. For me the FindBugs page is blank,
> not sure if that's to be expected?
>
> 97 sk
+0 (non-binding)
Built from zipped sources, digests look fine. JDK 1.8.0_40 on Win 8.1.
(Site build fails as mentioned already).
Site builds fine from JDK 1.7.0_75. For me the FindBugs page is blank,
not sure if that's to be expected?
97 skipped tests seems a little high (think this was mentioned
+1 (non-binding)
So far I've checked: signatures and digests. source release file layout,
matched tags and commit ids, NOTICE and LICENSE files, build sources in a
clean environment (maven 3.0.5, jdks 7u71-2.5.3 and 8.0_25, under debian
64bits)
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Benedikt Ritter wr
3, 2015 9:56 AM
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Lang 3.4 based on RC2
Hi all,
We've worked through the issues identified in Commons Lang 3.4 RC1, so I
would like to call a vote for releasing Commons Lang 3.4 based on RC2.
The changes since RC1 are:
- Fixed TimeZone related problem in t
Hi all,
We've worked through the issues identified in Commons Lang 3.4 RC1, so I
would like to call a vote for releasing Commons Lang 3.4 based on RC2.
The changes since RC1 are:
- Fixed TimeZone related problem in test cases
- Fixed broken windows OS detection in SystemUtils
- Added OS X support
12 matches
Mail list logo
