Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Commons IO 2.6 based on RC3

2019-09-20 Thread Gary Gregory
So is it safe to add a rel/ tag for the same commit as 2.6 RC3? Will you do that or shall I? Gary On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 8:37 AM sebb wrote: > On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 at 13:30, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > > Based on the "I’ll publish the release tomorrow." below it looks like he > > did publish it

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Commons IO 2.6 based on RC3

2019-09-20 Thread sebb
On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 at 13:30, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Based on the "I’ll publish the release tomorrow." below it looks like he > did publish it since it is in the maven repo, on dist, and the site is up, > but seems to have not completed all the steps. > I could not find an announce email for 2.5

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Commons IO 2.6 based on RC3

2019-09-20 Thread Gary Gregory
Based on the "I’ll publish the release tomorrow." below it looks like he did publish it since it is in the maven repo, on dist, and the site is up, but seems to have not completed all the steps. I could not find an announce email for 2.5 either, could you? Gary On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 7:38 AM seb

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Commons IO 2.6 based on RC3

2019-09-20 Thread sebb
It looks like this was not completed: could not find an announce email, and the tag has not been created (see recent user@ email) On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 at 19:26, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > > Hello, > > > Am 15.10.2017 um 12:22 schrieb Benedikt Ritter : > > > > Hello, > > > > we have fixed quite a few

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Commons IO 2.6 based on RC3

2017-10-18 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hello, > Am 15.10.2017 um 12:22 schrieb Benedikt Ritter : > > Hello, > > we have fixed quite a few bugs and added some nice new features since Apache > Commons IO 2.5 was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons IO 2.6 > based on RC3. > > The changes between RC1 and RC2 are: > - Wo

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons IO 2.6 based on RC3

2017-10-18 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hi, here is my +1 for this release. Benedikt > Am 15.10.2017 um 12:22 schrieb Benedikt Ritter : > > Hello, > > we have fixed quite a few bugs and added some nice new features since Apache > Commons IO 2.5 was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons IO 2.6 > based on RC3. > > The

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons IO 2.6 based on RC3

2017-10-17 Thread Pascal Schumacher
should read "five year old issue..." Am 17.10.2017 um 22:05 schrieb Pascal Schumacher: Seems to be intentional and the case since 2.4. There is already a five year only issue complaining about this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-350 Am 17.10.2017 um 22:01 schrieb Oliver Heger: Bui

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons IO 2.6 based on RC3

2017-10-17 Thread Pascal Schumacher
Seems to be intentional and the case since 2.4. There is already a five year only issue complaining about this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-350 Am 17.10.2017 um 22:01 schrieb Oliver Heger: Build works fine with Java 1.7 and 1.8 on Windows 10. Artifacts and site look good. There i

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons IO 2.6 based on RC3

2017-10-17 Thread Oliver Heger
Build works fine with Java 1.7 and 1.8 on Windows 10. Artifacts and site look good. There is something strange in the OSGi meta data: The Export-Package header obviously lists wrong version numbers for some of the packages. For about half of the packages the version is set to "1.4.", for the o

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons IO 2.6 based on RC3

2017-10-16 Thread Gary Gregory
+1 The bin zip contains the jar, which itself does NOT contain a cobertura properties file (which failed RC2) The src zip ASC, MD5 and SHA-1 are OK. The site builds with 'mvn clean site' and Apache Maven 3.5.0 (ff8f5e7444045639af65f6095c62210b5713f426; 2017-04-03T13:39:06-06:00) Maven home: C:\

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons IO 2.6 based on RC3

2017-10-16 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 15.10.2017 um 17:28 schrieb Gary Gregory: > How do you verify that the class files are not Cobertura tweaked? Can we > add that as a step to the wiki and commons build plugin? As long as there is no cobertura.properties file in the root of the jar, we should be on the safe side. However, it

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons IO 2.6 based on RC3

2017-10-16 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hi, > Am 15.10.2017 um 17:28 schrieb Gary Gregory : > > How do you verify that the class files are not Cobertura tweaked? Can we > add that as a step to the wiki and commons build plugin? I explicitly called mvn clean deploy this time. Benedikt > > Gary > > On Oct 15, 2017 04:22, "Benedikt R

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons IO 2.6 based on RC3

2017-10-15 Thread Gary Gregory
How do you verify that the class files are not Cobertura tweaked? Can we add that as a step to the wiki and commons build plugin? Gary On Oct 15, 2017 04:22, "Benedikt Ritter" wrote: > Hello, > > we have fixed quite a few bugs and added some nice new features since > Apache Commons IO 2.5 was r

[VOTE] Release Apache Commons IO 2.6 based on RC3

2017-10-15 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hello, we have fixed quite a few bugs and added some nice new features since Apache Commons IO 2.5 was released, so I would like to release Apache Commons IO 2.6 based on RC3. The changes between RC1 and RC2 are: - Worked on the design of the ByteOrderParser class - Fixed IO-546 - Fixed IO-553