On 21 October 2011 16:04, Matt Benson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 5:27 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 21 October 2011 11:03, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>>> Le 21/10/2011 11:10, Simone Tripodi a écrit :
>>>
So, as you proposed, would be reasonable to drop the 1.0 and decide
upon for a 0.1 as cur
On 10/21/11 8:49 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 21/10/2011 17:04, Matt Benson a écrit :
>
>> The most immediate thing is that [proxy] 2 needs a unary predicate.
>> It becomes ridiculous for every component we have to define such a
>> basic interface in a different way. So [proxy] 2 can never be
>>
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 21/10/2011 17:04, Matt Benson a écrit :
>
>> The most immediate thing is that [proxy] 2 needs a unary predicate.
>> It becomes ridiculous for every component we have to define such a
>> basic interface in a different way. So [proxy] 2 c
On 10/21/11 8:04 AM, Matt Benson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 5:27 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 21 October 2011 11:03, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>>> Le 21/10/2011 11:10, Simone Tripodi a écrit :
>>>
So, as you proposed, would be reasonable to drop the 1.0 and decide
upon for a 0.1 as current r
Le 21/10/2011 17:04, Matt Benson a écrit :
The most immediate thing is that [proxy] 2 needs a unary predicate.
It becomes ridiculous for every component we have to define such a
basic interface in a different way. So [proxy] 2 can never be
released without a [functor] release, etc.
Maybe the
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 5:27 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 21 October 2011 11:03, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>> Le 21/10/2011 11:10, Simone Tripodi a écrit :
>>
>>> So, as you proposed, would be reasonable to drop the 1.0 and decide
>>> upon for a 0.1 as current release?
>>
>> Yes, or a 1.0-beta with clear ind
On 21 October 2011 11:03, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 21/10/2011 11:10, Simone Tripodi a écrit :
>
>> So, as you proposed, would be reasonable to drop the 1.0 and decide
>> upon for a 0.1 as current release?
>
> Yes, or a 1.0-beta with clear indications that this is a preview intended to
> gather u
Le 21/10/2011 11:10, Simone Tripodi a écrit :
So, as you proposed, would be reasonable to drop the 1.0 and decide
upon for a 0.1 as current release?
Yes, or a 1.0-beta with clear indications that this is a preview
intended to gather user feedback.
Emmanuel Bourg
---
Hi guys,
thanks a lot for the deep review!
I didn't put any effort on the design but only to prepare the package
- like always, any suggestion is much more than welcome!
And of course we would need a lot of help to improve the quality of
the component.
So, as you proposed, would be reasonable to dr
On 21 October 2011 00:07, sebb wrote:
> On 20 October 2011 23:31, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a mixed feeling about this release. If I remember well this code
>> predates Java 5, and despite the amazing work that has been put into to
>> generify the code, I wonder if it has been suf
On 20 October 2011 23:31, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a mixed feeling about this release. If I remember well this code
> predates Java 5, and despite the amazing work that has been put into to
> generify the code, I wonder if it has been sufficiently thought out for a
> Java 5 world.
I
Hi,
I have a mixed feeling about this release. If I remember well this code
predates Java 5, and despite the amazing work that has been put into to
generify the code, I wonder if it has been sufficiently thought out for
a Java 5 world. I also made some observations, in no specific order:
- t
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> I'm writing to call for a vote to release apache commons-functor-1.0
> based on RC1.
>
> The vote will stay open for 72 hours and closes on Sunday 23th, at 5:40pm CET.
>
> Many thanks in advance for reviewing, have a nice day
Hi all guys,
I'm writing to call for a vote to release apache commons-functor-1.0
based on RC1.
The vote will stay open for 72 hours and closes on Sunday 23th, at 5:40pm CET.
Many thanks in advance for reviewing, have a nice day!
All the best,
Simo
Release notes:
http://people.apache.org/build
14 matches
Mail list logo
