Hi all,
this vote has passed with five +1 binding votes from following [commons] PMCs:
Oliver Heger
Jörg Schaible
Henri Yandell
Simone Tripodi
Phil Steitz
I'm going to proceed to next steps, thanks everybody who took part to
the release process!!!
Have a nice day,
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~
On 4/30/11 3:02 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi Phil,
> thanks for reviewing, very appreciated!
>
> 0) is it fine fixing these warning for the current SNAPSHOT?
Yes, that is what I meant by not a showstopper. I am +1 on
releasing as is.
> 1) indeed, they have been generated by the release-plugin. H
Hi Phil,
thanks for reviewing, very appreciated!
0) is it fine fixing these warning for the current SNAPSHOT?
1) indeed, they have been generated by the release-plugin. How do we
manage this situation? Do we update them manually before/after tagging
the release?
Many thanks in advance,
Simo
http
On 4/27/11 12:38 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all guys!
> After the failed RC1, I'm here to propose a new Apache
> Commons-DIscovery release, based on RC2, please cast your votes!
> Many thanks in advance to everybody will take part to the vote process :)
> All the best,
> Simo
>
> Release notes:
I gave more checks and I'm +1 to release the Discovery
anyway I would really appreciate Phil's opinion before proceeding :)
Have a nice weekend,
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi Phil,
> md5/sha1 hav
Hi Phil,
md5/sha1 have been (finally!) restored; about the maven-metadata.xml
file, I noticed the same when I proposed the Digester 2.1[1], anyway
everything went fine when copied staged artifacts.
Simo
[1]
http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/digester/2.1/RC2/staged/commons-digester/commons-d
Need to get the md5's restored before I can vote on this.
One other thing that I am not sure about is the content of the
maven-metadata.xml file. It lists only the new release. I remember
us getting some backlash a year or so ago when we released something
with metadata like that, since it appar
+1.
Note that src/conf/* can be excluded if the Ant build is not included
in the src distro.
Hen
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi all guys!
> After the failed RC1, I'm here to propose a new Apache
> Commons-DIscovery release, based on RC2, please cast your votes!
> M
Hi Simone,
Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all guys!
> After the failed RC1, I'm here to propose a new Apache
> Commons-DIscovery release, based on RC2, please cast your votes!
> Many thanks in advance to everybody will take part to the vote process :)
> All the best,
> Simo
>
> Release notes:
>
> h
Hi Phil,
indeed I abused of bash scripting :( going to re-update them in a while :P
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 4/28/11 1:16 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>> Hi Oliver,
>> thanks for your review! Abou
On 4/28/11 1:16 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi Oliver,
> thanks for your review! About your questions:
>
> - I should have deleted the md5/sha1 files because I got confused by
> the paragraph "C.2 Remove SHA1 and MD5 Fingerprints of PGP Signatures"
> on wiki[1], but I can easily re-upload them;
Wh
Hi Emmanuel,
as I replied to Oliver, 0.5 is just a maintenance release, (fixed
bugs, checkstyle errors, ...) and any other improvement wasn't even
planned.
Feel free to fill a JIRA issue to remind everybody this is a work has
to be done for 0.6.
Many thanks for your review, have a nice day!!!
Simo
Hi Oliver,
thanks for your review! About your questions:
- I should have deleted the md5/sha1 files because I got confused by
the paragraph "C.2 Remove SHA1 and MD5 Fingerprints of PGP Signatures"
on wiki[1], but I can easily re-upload them;
- About the description: I'll add it as well and re-up
It's not a regression issue though. I'd recommend opening up a JIRA
item to make sure it's something that 0.6 thinks about.
Hen
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> I'm a bit concerned by the low test coverage (~40%). Some classes like
> ServiceDiscoveryTask are not even tes
I'm a bit concerned by the low test coverage (~40%). Some classes like
ServiceDiscoveryTask are not even tested.
Emmanuel Bourg
Le 27/04/2011 21:38, Simone Tripodi a écrit :
Hi all guys!
After the failed RC1, I'm here to propose a new Apache
Commons-DIscovery release, based on RC2, please c
The build runs fine under Windows 7 with Java 1.5 and 1.6. Site and
artifacts look good.
Here are some minor comments:
- The binaries are missing md5 files. Not sure whether they are really
required, but other components use to have them.
- In the release notes under "Introduction" it may be us
Hi all guys!
After the failed RC1, I'm here to propose a new Apache
Commons-DIscovery release, based on RC2, please cast your votes!
Many thanks in advance to everybody will take part to the vote process :)
All the best,
Simo
Release notes:
http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/discovery/0.5/RC
17 matches
Mail list logo
