good work, thanks
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 11:34 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 10 December 2011 10:02, sebb wrote:
>> On 10 December 2011 07:17, Simone Tripodi w
On 10 December 2011 10:02, sebb wrote:
> On 10 December 2011 07:17, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>> nice approach, thanks!
>> I just wonder if we can move txt files on the root instead that
>> putting in assembly related stuff dir - at the end of the day, names
>> don't collide...
>
> Might be confusing
On 10 December 2011 07:17, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> nice approach, thanks!
> I just wonder if we can move txt files on the root instead that
> putting in assembly related stuff dir - at the end of the day, names
> don't collide...
Might be confusing to the end-user.
> Ready to cut a new RC, thank
Due to legal issue, this vote can be considered canceled.
I'll cut a new RC during the day, thanks for reviewing!
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Simone
nice approach, thanks!
I just wonder if we can move txt files on the root instead that
putting in assembly related stuff dir - at the end of the day, names
don't collide...
Ready to cut a new RC, thanks again,
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http
On 9 December 2011 20:17, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> OK, fine and thanks
It was a bit trickier than I thought, but I think it's working now.
In the end did not need to create a sub-module for the packaging -
just had to find out how to override the default N&L files.
> -Simo
>
> http://people.apac
OK, fine and thanks
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 9:03 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 9 December 2011 19:25, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>>>
>>> By inclusion, I meant source o
On 9 December 2011 19:25, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>>
>> By inclusion, I meant source or binary.
>> But in both cases the license must be included in LICENSE file.
>>
>> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#distributing-code-under-several-licenses
>>
>
> thanks, that is useful not just for that rel
>
> By inclusion, I meant source or binary.
> But in both cases the license must be included in LICENSE file.
>
> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#distributing-code-under-several-licenses
>
thanks, that is useful not just for that release
>
> It's up to you, but it looks easy enough to chan
On 9 December 2011 18:38, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>>
>> There are two aspects to this.
>>
>> 1) Does the artifact actually included the 3rd party code?
>> If not, then it should not be mentioned at all.
>>
>
> it does not include the 3rd party source code, only the binary
> artifact - and it has to
>
> There are two aspects to this.
>
> 1) Does the artifact actually included the 3rd party code?
> If not, then it should not be mentioned at all.
>
it does not include the 3rd party source code, only the binary
artifact - and it has to be mentioned because, as reported in their
license,
> "2. R
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 5:23 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 9 December 2011 15:40, Simone Tripodi wrote:
[X] -1 no, do not release it because... (please explain why)
The NOTICE file mentions http://asm.ow2.org/ but the LICENSE file does
>>> not include its LICENSE.
>>
>> ASM is a _transitive_ depe
On 9 December 2011 15:40, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>>> [X] -1 no, do not release it because... (please explain why)
>>> The NOTICE file mentions http://asm.ow2.org/ but the LICENSE file does
>> not include its LICENSE.
>
> ASM is a _transitive_ dependency brought by CGLIB and mentioning it in
> the N
>> [X] -1 no, do not release it because... (please explain why)
>> The NOTICE file mentions http://asm.ow2.org/ but the LICENSE file does
> not include its LICENSE.
ASM is a _transitive_ dependency brought by CGLIB and mentioning it in
the NOTICE file is required for the uber-jar, as expressed in
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> [X] +1 release it
Checked the site, the sha1/md5 checksums, opened sources, all fine for me.
--
http://www.grobmeier.de
https://www.timeandbill.de
-
To unsubscribe, e-ma
On 9 December 2011 14:19, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all guys,I'm writing to call for a vote to release apache
> commons-digester-3.2 based on RC1.
> Please take in consideration that: * broken 3.2 links will be fixed
> once the site will be deployed; * there is a Clirr violation, but 1)
> targe
Hi all guys,I'm writing to call for a vote to release apache
commons-digester-3.2 based on RC1.
Please take in consideration that: * broken 3.2 links will be fixed
once the site will be deployed; * there is a Clirr violation, but 1)
target class is used for internal use only - there is no way use
17 matches
Mail list logo
