The following votes were cast:
Binding:
+1: markt, chtompki, garydgregory
No other votes were cast. The vote therefore passes.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: d
+1
Tested using:
commons-daemon-1.2.3-src.zip=41bb51826f4c90d00091c258e03275142c64a33d898e65eea901fe00f7d75d13fcae4d783337c77bf5d4b6cda428bc12a092b28260c0c77b706e456ab410e14a
sha512sum says OK.
Apache RAT check OK
Apache CLIRR check OK
TODO: Add Maven command line and report support for Checkstyl
For those that aren't voting because the SHA512 hashes weren't included
in the original VOTE here there are:
#Release SHA-512s
commons-daemon-1.2.3-bin.tar.gz=0d7ced8f5d6fd3e8781146ee47c37046c6ccd2f364138f89d137eea5f0255e1b2afae5faf7005164c077087cb08203fd44478d5c14c57c7df449feb324443447
commons-da
On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 2:25 PM Rob Tompkins wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Sep 7, 2020, at 2:16 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> >
> > On 07/09/2020 18:18, sebb wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >> Such automation already exists, and is used to generate the VOTE
> >> emails used by many Commons RMs
> >>
> >> $ mvn commons-rel
> On Sep 7, 2020, at 2:16 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
> On 07/09/2020 18:18, sebb wrote:
>
>
>
>> Such automation already exists, and is used to generate the VOTE
>> emails used by many Commons RMs
>>
>> $ mvn commons-release:vote-txt
>
> Thanks for that.
>
> I tried it out on the 1.2.3-RC
On 07/09/2020 18:18, sebb wrote:
> Such automation already exists, and is used to generate the VOTE
> emails used by many Commons RMs
>
> $ mvn commons-release:vote-txt
Thanks for that.
I tried it out on the 1.2.3-RC1 release directory and it looks like it
depends on various naming convention
On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 at 16:12, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
> On 07/09/2020 15:26, sebb wrote:
> > Suppose we take the following example:
> >
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/c99519e1c8e0a4af5be02f40e8e44b408cbc3d4568a334f3a400b94f%40%3Cdev.commons.apache.org%3E
> >
> > This is Commons Daemon 1.2.0
As long as your private key is safe, whatever the signed parts are will be
tamper proof. Git lets you sign commits; does SVN offer anything similar?
On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 10:12 Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 07/09/2020 15:26, sebb wrote:
>
> > Suppose we take the following example:
>
> >
>
> >
> https
On 07/09/2020 15:26, sebb wrote:
> Suppose we take the following example:
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/c99519e1c8e0a4af5be02f40e8e44b408cbc3d4568a334f3a400b94f%40%3Cdev.commons.apache.org%3E
>
> This is Commons Daemon 1.2.0 based on RC2.
>
> Take for example:
>
> https://archive.apa
On 07/09/2020 15:40, Rob Tompkins wrote:
> Also, I would think we should be as accommodating as possible to Mark as he
> is indeed the top maintainer on [daemon]. I doubt we’d be making progress
> there with out him.
>
> I’ve found his [VOTE] threads to be entirely sufficient for validation
>
Also, I would think we should be as accommodating as possible to Mark as he is
indeed the top maintainer on [daemon]. I doubt we’d be making progress there
with out him.
I’ve found his [VOTE] threads to be entirely sufficient for validation despite
their differences in content. I’m. +1 for con
Suppose we take the following example:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/c99519e1c8e0a4af5be02f40e8e44b408cbc3d4568a334f3a400b94f%40%3Cdev.commons.apache.org%3E
This is Commons Daemon 1.2.0 based on RC2.
Take for example:
https://archive.apache.org/dist/commons/daemon/source/commons-daemon-1
Hello.
> > [...]
> > see an explanation for why it is necessary
> > (or even helpful) to include artefact hashes in the vote mail.
> >
> I agree and understand all your points here.
Well, I don't.
An explanation would be useful indeed.
> > Validating the svn revision for the dist repo [ ... vs .
> On Sep 7, 2020, at 6:15 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
> On 04/09/2020 12:30, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>> +1 binding.
>
> Thanks for testing and voting.
>
>> Builds on java 7 and java 11 works with ‘mvn clean test’
>>
>> Build on java 8 works with ‘mvn clean test install site’
>>
>> % mvn -version
On 04/09/2020 12:30, Rob Tompkins wrote:
> +1 binding.
Thanks for testing and voting.
> Builds on java 7 and java 11 works with ‘mvn clean test’
>
> Build on java 8 works with ‘mvn clean test install site’
>
> % mvn -version
> Apache Maven 3.6.3 (cecedd343002696d0abb50b32b541b8a6ba2883f)
> Mave
+1 binding.
Builds on java 7 and java 11 works with ‘mvn clean test’
Build on java 8 works with ‘mvn clean test install site’
% mvn -version
Apache Maven 3.6.3 (cecedd343002696d0abb50b32b541b8a6ba2883f)
Maven home: /usr/local/Cellar/maven/3.6.3_1/libexec
Java version: 1.8.0_242, vendor: Amazon.c
On Fri, 4 Sep 2020 at 00:06, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 11:43 AM Mark Thomas wrote:
>
> > On 03/09/2020 15:37, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 10:17 AM Mark Thomas wrote:
> > >
> > >> On 03/09/2020 14:06, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > >>> Mark,
> > >>>
> > >>> The
On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 11:43 AM Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 03/09/2020 15:37, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 10:17 AM Mark Thomas wrote:
> >
> >> On 03/09/2020 14:06, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >>> Mark,
> >>>
> >>> The vote email must contain SHA256 or 512 hashes for the file bin and
> g
On 03/09/2020 15:37, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 10:17 AM Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>> On 03/09/2020 14:06, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>> Mark,
>>>
>>> The vote email must contain SHA256 or 512 hashes for the file bin and gz
>>> files in https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/daemon
On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 10:17 AM Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 03/09/2020 14:06, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > Mark,
> >
> > The vote email must contain SHA256 or 512 hashes for the file bin and gz
> > files in https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/daemon/
> >
> > Per https://commons.apache.org/relea
On 03/09/2020 14:06, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Mark,
>
> The vote email must contain SHA256 or 512 hashes for the file bin and gz
> files in https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/daemon/
>
> Per https://commons.apache.org/releases/prepare.html
>
> (There is no need to hash the files twice o
Mark,
The vote email must contain SHA256 or 512 hashes for the file bin and gz
files in https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/daemon/
Per https://commons.apache.org/releases/prepare.html
(There is no need to hash the files twice on
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/daemon/)
On 01/09/2020 19:25, Mark Thomas wrote:
> [X] Approved - go ahead and release Commons Daemon 1.2.3 RC1 as 1.2.3
Tested with Apache Tomcat.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional comma
Apologies for the slight delay between the tag and the vote. There was
an issue with the code signing service we use to sign the Windows binaries.
It has been almost a year since the last Commons Daemon release. Notable
changes since 1.2.2 include:
- Improved debug logging for error conditions
- A
24 matches
Mail list logo
