On 15/11/17 10:57, sebb wrote:
> On 15 November 2017 at 09:59, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> I'm cancelling this vote and will roll RC3 to pick up the following changes:
>>
>> - packages distributed via Maven Central
>> - binary test artefacts won't be distributed
>> - fix for DAEMON-377 (need to review a
On 15 November 2017 at 09:59, Mark Thomas wrote:
> I'm cancelling this vote and will roll RC3 to pick up the following changes:
>
> - packages distributed via Maven Central
> - binary test artefacts won't be distributed
> - fix for DAEMON-377 (need to review and apply patch first)
Does DAEMON-378
I'm cancelling this vote and will roll RC3 to pick up the following changes:
- packages distributed via Maven Central
- binary test artefacts won't be distributed
- fix for DAEMON-377 (need to review and apply patch first)
I hope to be able to tag and roll the RC later today.
Mark
On 09/11/17 2
FTR, Nexus says:
*Deployer properties:*
- "userAgent" = "Apache-Maven/3.3.9 (Java 1.7.0_80; Linux
4.4.0-98-generic)"
- "userId" = "markt"
- "ip" = "81.156.41.218"
*Details:*
The following artifacts have been staged
/commons-daemon/commons-daemon/1.1.0/commons-daemon-1.1.0-tests.ja
On 12 November 2017 15:21:20 GMT+00:00, Gary Gregory
wrote:
>I've not lost track. Just busy.
I know that feeling.
> FWIW, I have a product at works that
>depends on the bin zip file being in Maven repos through Ivy:
That is reason enough for me for an RC3. I'll probably look at that early nex
I've not lost track. Just busy. FWIW, I have a product at works that
depends on the bin zip file being in Maven repos through Ivy:
Gary
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 5:40 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 09/11/17 20:15, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>
>
> > The proposed release is:
> >
> > The
On 09/11/17 20:15, Mark Thomas wrote:
> The proposed release is:
>
> The proposed 1.1.0 release based on RC2 is:
> [ ] Broken - do not release because...
> [ ] Approved - go ahead and release as 1.1.0
I'm undecided.
>From a functional, policy and packaging point of view I don't have any
con
On 09/11/17 21:43, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>> On 09/11/17 20:18, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>> There is a lot of required information missing from this VOTE request.
>>
>> No there isn't. The VOTE contains more than the minimum necessary
>> information
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 09/11/17 20:18, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > There is a lot of required information missing from this VOTE request.
>
> No there isn't. The VOTE contains more than the minimum necessary
> information for a VOTE that is consistent with ASF policy.
On 09/11/17 20:18, Gary Gregory wrote:
> There is a lot of required information missing from this VOTE request.
No there isn't. The VOTE contains more than the minimum necessary
information for a VOTE that is consistent with ASF policy.
Take a look at a typical httpd vote thread:
http://markmail.
There is a lot of required information missing from this VOTE request.
How about following the format in
http://commons.apache.org/releases/prepare.html ?
Gary
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 1:15 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> The Apache Commons Deamon 1.1.0 release based on RC2 is now ready for
> voting.
>
The Apache Commons Deamon 1.1.0 release based on RC2 is now ready for
voting.
It can be obtained from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/daemon/
The Maven staging repo is:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1291/
The svn tag is:
https://svn.apache.or
12 matches
Mail list logo
