[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Commons Configuration 2.1.1 based on RC1

2017-02-08 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hi, > Am 05.02.2017 um 15:23 schrieb Benedikt Ritter : > > Hi, > > we’ve fixed some bugs since the release of Commons Configuration 2.1 so I’d > like to call a vote to release Commons Configuration 2.1.1 based on RC1. > > Commons Configuration 2.1.1 RC1 is available for review here: > https:/

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Configuration 2.1.1 based on RC1

2017-02-08 Thread Rob Tompkins
Build works fine with Java 1.6, 1.7, and 1.8 on Mac OS X 10.12.3. Artifacts and site look good. +1 -Rob > On Feb 5, 2017, at 9:23 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > > Hi, > > we’ve fixed some bugs since the release of Commons Configuration 2.1 so I’d > like to call a vote to release Commons Confi

Re: [CONFIGURATION]: JavaDoc for generated classes (Was: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Configuration 2.1.1 based on RC1)

2017-02-07 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 07.02.2017 um 08:35 schrieb Benedikt Ritter: > >> Am 07.02.2017 um 08:29 schrieb Gary Gregory : >> >> Should we generate code in its own package? > > Let’s move this to it’s own thread… > > Generating the classes in their own packe would be an option. The package > could have a name that m

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Configuration 2.1.1 based on RC1

2017-02-07 Thread Benedikt Ritter
> Am 05.02.2017 um 15:23 schrieb Benedikt Ritter : > > Hi, > > we’ve fixed some bugs since the release of Commons Configuration 2.1 so I’d > like to call a vote to release Commons Configuration 2.1.1 based on RC1. > > Commons Configuration 2.1.1 RC1 is available for review here: > https://dis

[CONFIGURATION]: JavaDoc for generated classes (Was: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Configuration 2.1.1 based on RC1)

2017-02-06 Thread Benedikt Ritter
> Am 07.02.2017 um 08:29 schrieb Gary Gregory : > > Should we generate code in its own package? Let’s move this to it’s own thread… Generating the classes in their own packe would be an option. The package could have a name that makes clear that the classes are generated. But I’d leave that t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Configuration 2.1.1 based on RC1

2017-02-06 Thread Gary Gregory
Should we generate code in its own package? Gary On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 11:23 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > > > Am 06.02.2017 um 18:07 schrieb Oliver Heger < > oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de>: > > > > > > > > Am 06.02.2017 um 00:00 schrieb Gary Gregory: > >> +1 > >> > >> bin zip MD5, SHA1, ASC OK.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Configuration 2.1.1 based on RC1

2017-02-06 Thread Benedikt Ritter
> Am 06.02.2017 um 18:07 schrieb Oliver Heger : > > > > Am 06.02.2017 um 00:00 schrieb Gary Gregory: >> +1 >> >> bin zip MD5, SHA1, ASC OK. >> src zip MD5, SHA1, ASC OK. >> src zip RAT check OK. >> src zip CLIRR check OK. >> >> Building with 'mvn clean test' OK. >> >> Building site with 'mvn

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Configuration 2.1.1 based on RC1

2017-02-06 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 06.02.2017 um 00:00 schrieb Gary Gregory: > +1 > > bin zip MD5, SHA1, ASC OK. > src zip MD5, SHA1, ASC OK. > src zip RAT check OK. > src zip CLIRR check OK. > > Building with 'mvn clean test' OK. > > Building site with 'mvn site' > > Using: > > Apache Maven 3.3.9 (bb52d8502b132ec0a5a3f4c0

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Configuration 2.1.1 based on RC1

2017-02-06 Thread Sergio Fernández
+1 (non-binding) On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hi, > > we’ve fixed some bugs since the release of Commons Configuration 2.1 so > I’d like to call a vote to release Commons Configuration 2.1.1 based on RC1. > > Commons Configuration 2.1.1 RC1 is available for review her

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Configuration 2.1.1 based on RC1

2017-02-05 Thread Gary Gregory
+1 bin zip MD5, SHA1, ASC OK. src zip MD5, SHA1, ASC OK. src zip RAT check OK. src zip CLIRR check OK. Building with 'mvn clean test' OK. Building site with 'mvn site' Using: Apache Maven 3.3.9 (bb52d8502b132ec0a5a3f4c09453c07478323dc5; 2015-11-10T08:41:47-08:00) Maven home: C:\Java\apache-mav

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Configuration 2.1.1 based on RC1

2017-02-05 Thread Oliver Heger
Build works fine with Java 1.6 and 1.8 on Windows 10. Artifacts and site look good. +1 Many thanks! Oliver Am 05.02.2017 um 15:23 schrieb Benedikt Ritter: > Hi, > > we’ve fixed some bugs since the release of Commons Configuration 2.1 so I’d > like to call a vote to release Commons Configuratio

[VOTE] Release Apache Commons Configuration 2.1.1 based on RC1

2017-02-05 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hi, we’ve fixed some bugs since the release of Commons Configuration 2.1 so I’d like to call a vote to release Commons Configuration 2.1.1 based on RC1. Commons Configuration 2.1.1 RC1 is available for review here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/configuration (svn rev. 1814) T