On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 2:37 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 5 April 2011 09:32, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>
>>> [Side note; this is insane:
>>> http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-encryption.html - I vomit
>>> every time it's implied I should put
On 5 April 2011 09:32, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
>> [Side note; this is insane:
>> http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-encryption.html - I vomit
>> every time it's implied I should put passwords in the Maven settings
>> file]
>
> Totall
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Very late, but I've been a tad busy in the new-parent department.
You didn't publish a POM yet, did you? ;-)
> What I do care about is releasing often. Which is farcical given how
> few times I've released. I want to release every month.
Very late, but I've been a tad busy in the new-parent department.
Generally I agree with Phil's email. I don't really care though - I
recognize that my main pain with Nexus is a) the experience to know
not to trust magical systems & b) not being full of energy to follow
yet another build system ch
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 5:46 PM, sebb wrote:
> If they are left in Nexus staging, AFAIK they end up in Maven Central
> when promoted.
And your point is?
--
I Am What I Am And That's All What I Yam (Popeye)
-
To unsubscribe,
On Mar 31, 2011, at 8:49 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 31 March 2011 12:08, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 2:38 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>
>>> And then you need to check the hashes and sigs again since you are
>>> now working with downloaded copies of the files that we voted on.
>>> S
On 31 March 2011 12:08, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 2:38 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
>> And then you need to check the hashes and sigs again since you are
>> now working with downloaded copies of the files that we voted on.
>> Seems much easier and more correct to me to just scp
On 31 March 2011 12:05, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 1:36 AM, sebb wrote:
>
>> AFAIK, wget alone won't do, as the files also have to be deleted.
>
> Why? There's no problem with leaving them where they are.
If they are left in Nexus staging, AFAIK they end up in Maven Central
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 2:38 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> And then you need to check the hashes and sigs again since you are
> now working with downloaded copies of the files that we voted on.
> Seems much easier and more correct to me to just scp the files to
> p.a.o., let people vote on them and *m
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 1:36 AM, sebb wrote:
> AFAIK, wget alone won't do, as the files also have to be deleted.
Why? There's no problem with leaving them where they are.
> Also, it would be best if that part of the process could be done from
> the users system, rather than having to login to
On 31 March 2011 04:00, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 3/30/11 6:57 PM, sebb wrote:
>> On 31 March 2011 01:38, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> On 3/30/11 4:22 PM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> I disagree with this. The most important artifacts are th
On 3/30/11 7:07 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> I'm seeing a lot of complaining on these threads but no actual proposal.
I started the thread with a proposal, which was to standardize on
the process documented on the web site. I know you don't like that
process and I am not going to insist that we force
On 3/30/11 6:57 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 31 March 2011 01:38, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 3/30/11 4:22 PM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>>
I disagree with this. The most important artifacts are the
zips/tars that go to dist/. These *are* the
I'm seeing a lot of complaining on these threads but no actual proposal. If the
proposal is to move away from Maven/Nexus for a release for all of commons I'll
vote -1. OTOH, If some release managers want to do the release some other way
I'm not going to force them to use Maven/Nexus.
Ralph
On 31 March 2011 01:38, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 3/30/11 4:22 PM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>
>>> I disagree with this. The most important artifacts are the
>>> zips/tars that go to dist/. These *are* the ASF release. Nexus
>>> makes it *hard
On 3/30/11 4:22 PM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
>> I disagree with this. The most important artifacts are the
>> zips/tars that go to dist/. These *are* the ASF release. Nexus
>> makes it *harder* IMO to maintain provenance of these artifacts.
On 31 March 2011 00:22, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
>> I disagree with this. The most important artifacts are the
>> zips/tars that go to dist/. These *are* the ASF release. Nexus
>> makes it *harder* IMO to maintain provenance of these artifa
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> I disagree with this. The most important artifacts are the
> zips/tars that go to dist/. These *are* the ASF release. Nexus
> makes it *harder* IMO to maintain provenance of these artifacts.
These artifacts are present in Nexus. Pulling th
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> There is this cool command called "cp" that works very well. There
> is another one called "tar" and even one called "scp" ;) If the
> problem is that we want to be more paranoid than we are with the
> mirrors for the maven stuff, why can't
On 3/30/11 11:23 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 30/03/2011 18:43, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> I get that, which is why I think some kind of middle ground where we
>> provide simple scripts to move stuff around on the ASF hosts might
>> be a good compromise. This is essentially what the ibiblio-rysnch
>> st
>
> > I cannot seem to have published the Maven bits to Maven places. There is
> no
> > 1.5 here:
> >
> > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/commons-codec/commons-codec/
>
Still nothing there. :(
Gary
On 30 March 2011 19:23, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 30/03/2011 18:43, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> I get that, which is why I think some kind of middle ground where we
>> provide simple scripts to move stuff around on the ASF hosts might
>> be a good compromise. This is essentially what the ibiblio-rysnch
>
On 30/03/2011 18:43, Phil Steitz wrote:
> I get that, which is why I think some kind of middle ground where we
> provide simple scripts to move stuff around on the ASF hosts might
> be a good compromise. This is essentially what the ibiblio-rysnch
> stuff does. The only manual missing piece is co
t;> I cannot seem to have published the Maven bits to Maven places. There is
>>>>> no
>>>>> 1.5 here:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/commons-codec/commons-codec/
>>>>>
>>>>> Because it is not here:
&
r non-Unix types to inspect the files and delete
> any that should not be there or upload others that are missing.
>
>> Phil
>>
>> Phil
>>>> Luc
>>>>
>>>>> I cannot seem to have published the Maven bits to Maven places. There is
>
>> Because it is not here:
>>>>
>>>> /x1/www/people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/commons-codec
>>>>
>>>> What does "Promote" out of Nexus do then?
>>>>
>>>> Should I copy the files to /www/
>>
es. There is no
>>>> 1.5 here:
>>>>
>>>> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/commons-codec/commons-codec/
>>>>
>>>> Because it is not here:
>>>>
>>>> /x1/www/people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/commons-codec
&g
t;Promote" out of Nexus do then?
>>>
>>> Should I copy the files to /www/
>>> people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository myself per
>>>
>>> http://commons.apache.org/releases/release.html
>>>
>>> under the section "3 D
ld I copy the files to /www/
>> people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository myself per
>>
>> http://commons.apache.org/releases/release.html
>>
>> under the section "3 Deploy Maven Artifacts"?
>>
>> Or will that cause problem with work I di
On 30 March 2011 08:07, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> On Mar 30, 2011, at 12:01 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>
>> Le 30/03/2011 03:36, Gary Gregory a écrit :
>>> Wait! I'm not done or I'm loosing my marbles...
>>>
>>> I followed the whole song and dance from:
>>>
>>> http://wiki.apache.org/commons/UsingNexus
Le 30/03/2011 09:07, Ralph Goers a écrit :
>
> On Mar 30, 2011, at 12:01 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>
>> Le 30/03/2011 03:36, Gary Gregory a écrit :
>>> Wait! I'm not done or I'm loosing my marbles...
>>>
>>> I followed the whole song and dance from:
>>>
>>> http://wiki.apache.org/commons/UsingNexu
On 3/30/11 12:02 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
On Mar 29, 2011, at 7:40 PM, Stephen Williams wrote:
On 3/29/11 7:33 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
On Mar 29, 2011, at 7:24 PM, Stephen Williams wrote:
...
So, lesson learned: Don't use Maven! ;-)
No, the other one: make copies of your code through multiple me
On Mar 30, 2011, at 12:01 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 30/03/2011 03:36, Gary Gregory a écrit :
>> Wait! I'm not done or I'm loosing my marbles...
>>
>> I followed the whole song and dance from:
>>
>> http://wiki.apache.org/commons/UsingNexus
>>
>> It's the last time I'll pick that route.
>
On Mar 29, 2011, at 7:40 PM, Stephen Williams wrote:
> On 3/29/11 7:33 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>> On Mar 29, 2011, at 7:24 PM, Stephen Williams wrote:
>>> ...
>>> So, lesson learned: Don't use Maven! ;-)
>>> No, the other one: make copies of your code through multiple means until it
>>> is compl
ns.apache.org/releases/release.html
>
> under the section "3 Deploy Maven Artifacts"?
>
> Or will that cause problem with work I did in Nexus (for the last time?)
>
> Thank you
>
> Gary
>
> ---------- Forwarded message --
> From: sebb
>
That wasn't maven. That was a sloppy eclipse "create project"
implementation.
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Stephen Williams wrote:
> So, lesson learned: Don't use Maven! ;-)
> No, the other one: make copies of your code through multiple means until it
> is completely safe. I hadn't lost c
On 3/29/11 7:33 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
On Mar 29, 2011, at 7:24 PM, Stephen Williams wrote:
...
So, lesson learned: Don't use Maven! ;-)
No, the other one: make copies of your code through multiple means until it is
completely safe. I hadn't lost code (or any data through paranoid backups tha
t/groups/staging/commons-codec/commons-codec/1.5/
> >>
> >> It usually takes some time to reach Maven Central, but this does seem
> >> to be taking longer than normal.
> >>
> >> Best to post a question on repository @ A.o - or I can do that for you
> &
On Mar 29, 2011, at 7:24 PM, Stephen Williams wrote:
> On 3/29/11 6:36 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> Wait! I'm not done or I'm loosing my marbles...
>
> ...
> As I noticed this note, seems like a good point to interject a Maven war
> story:
>
> I do not like Maven. I know I should, but it seems
On 3/29/11 6:36 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
Wait! I'm not done or I'm loosing my marbles...
...
As I noticed this note, seems like a good point to interject a Maven war story:
I do not like Maven. I know I should, but it seems too complicated and too hard to use on complex projects. I may get ov
mmons-codec/1.5/
>>
>> It usually takes some time to reach Maven Central, but this does seem
>> to be taking longer than normal.
>>
>> Best to post a question on repository @ A.o - or I can do that for you
>> if you prefer, as I'm subscribed already.
>
> Please
o - or I can do that for you
> if you prefer, as I'm subscribed already.
>
Please go ahead. Thank you!
Gary
>
> > Thank you
> >
> > Gary
> >
> > -- Forwarded message --
> > From: sebb
> > Date: Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:15 AM
&
l.
Best to post a question on repository @ A.o - or I can do that for you
if you prefer, as I'm subscribed already.
> Thank you
>
> Gary
>
> ------ Forwarded message --
> From: sebb
> Date: Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:15 AM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons
://commons.apache.org/releases/release.html
under the section "3 Deploy Maven Artifacts"?
Or will that cause problem with work I did in Nexus (for the last time?)
Thank you
Gary
-- Forwarded message --
From: sebb
Date: Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:15 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE]
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:23 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 29 March 2011 20:56, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 8:08 PM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 29 March 2011 18:33, Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:18 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 29 March 2011 16:52, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 29 March 2011 20:56, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 8:08 PM, sebb wrote:
>> On 29 March 2011 18:33, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:18 PM, sebb wrote:
On 29 March 2011 16:52, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 3/29/11 8:33 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 29 Ma
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 8:08 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 29 March 2011 18:33, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:18 PM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 29 March 2011 16:52, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 3/29/11 8:33 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 29 March 2011 16:20, Matt Benson wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar
On 29 March 2011 18:33, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:18 PM, sebb wrote:
>> On 29 March 2011 16:52, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> On 3/29/11 8:33 AM, sebb wrote:
On 29 March 2011 16:20, Matt Benson wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:08 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 29 March
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:18 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 29 March 2011 16:52, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 3/29/11 8:33 AM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 29 March 2011 16:20, Matt Benson wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:08 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 29 March 2011 16:02, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar
On 29 March 2011 16:52, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 3/29/11 8:33 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 29 March 2011 16:20, Matt Benson wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:08 AM, sebb wrote:
On 29 March 2011 16:02, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Phil Steitz
> wrote:
On 3/29/11 8:33 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 29 March 2011 16:20, Matt Benson wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:08 AM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 29 March 2011 16:02, Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> After another nightmare by an RM who has not cut a rel
On 29 March 2011 16:20, Matt Benson wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:08 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 29 March 2011 16:02, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
After another nightmare by an RM who has not cut a release in a
while, I think we need
On Mar 29, 2011, at 8:08 AM, sebb wrote:
>>
>
> Yes, that is true.
>
> Also, had the [net] release been using Nexus, it would have required 2
> additional manual stages to close and then release the Maven
> artifacts.
> It is impossible to accidentally release Maven artifacts using Maven
> com
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:08 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 29 March 2011 16:02, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> After another nightmare by an RM who has not cut a release in a
>>> while, I think we need to do something. The documentation on the
>>> Com
On 29 March 2011 16:02, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> After another nightmare by an RM who has not cut a release in a
>> while, I think we need to do something. The documentation on the
>> Commons web pages describes a process that works. I sug
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> After another nightmare by an RM who has not cut a release in a
> while, I think we need to do something. The documentation on the
> Commons web pages describes a process that works. I suggest that we
> standardize on that process, adding so
After another nightmare by an RM who has not cut a release in a
while, I think we need to do something. The documentation on the
Commons web pages describes a process that works. I suggest that we
standardize on that process, adding some simple automation scripts
that RMs can choose to use or no
s no such text.
>
> Sigh, the release process is so obtuse with the mixture of Maven, UNIX,
> Nexus, multiple instruction pages, and so on. It is quite discouraging and a
> barrier to progress :(
Patches welcome ...
> Gary
>
>>
>> Phil
>>
>>
>> >> sy
ks.sh: Command not found.
Not being found on the path.
>> sh symlinks.sh
> symlinks.sh: 46: Syntax error: word unexpected
You did not provide a parameter.
How does the script know what to link?
> I am stuck.
> Gary
>
>
>>
>> Sebb is right though that you should
ems with this and I will help.
>
> Sebb is right though that you should close the VOTE before moving
> stuff to dist/
>
> Phil
>
>
>>> symlinks.sh
>> symlinks.sh: Command not found.
>>
>>> sh symlinks.sh
>> symlinks.sh: 46: Syntax error: word unexp
> sh symlinks.sh
symlinks.sh: 46: Syntax error: word unexpected
I am stuck.
Gary
>
> Sebb is right though that you should close the VOTE before moving
> stuff to dist/
>
> Phil
>
>
> >> symlinks.sh
> > symlinks.sh: Command not found.
> >
> >> sh
, multiple instruction pages, and so on. It is quite discouraging and a
barrier to progress :(
Gary
>
> Phil
>
>
> >> symlinks.sh
> > symlinks.sh: Command not found.
> >
> >> sh symlinks.sh
> > symlinks.sh: 46: Syntax error: word unexpe
ected
>
> I need some UNIX help ;)
>
> Thank you,
> Gary
>
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 9:39 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
>> [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Codec 1.5-RC1
>>
>> Tag:
>>
>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/codec/tags/c
d not found.
> >
> >> sh symlinks.sh
> > symlinks.sh: 46: Syntax error: word unexpected
> >
> > I need some UNIX help ;)
>
> Not yet - see above.
>
> > Thank you,
> > Gary
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 9:39 PM, Gary Gre
t; symlinks.sh: 46: Syntax error: word unexpected
>
> I need some UNIX help ;)
Not yet - see above.
> Thank you,
> Gary
>
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 9:39 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
>> [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Codec 1.5-RC1
>>
>> Tag:
>>
>
se Apache Commons Codec 1.5-RC1
>
> Tag:
>
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/codec/tags/commons-codec-1.5-RC1
>
> Site:
>
> http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/codec/1.5/RC1/site/index.html
>
> Binaries:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/conte
Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 3/28/11 2:42 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>> Gary Gregory wrote:
>>> I just tried to install the IBM 1.5.0 JDK I found here:
>>> http://download.lenovo.com/ibmdl/pub/pc/pccbbs/thinkvantage_en/ibm-
java2-
>> ibmpc-jre-50-win-i386.exe
>>
>> The Linux version is not crippled.
>>
On 3/28/11 2:42 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Gary Gregory wrote:
>> I just tried to install the IBM 1.5.0 JDK I found here:
>> http://download.lenovo.com/ibmdl/pub/pc/pccbbs/thinkvantage_en/ibm-java2-
> ibmpc-jre-50-win-i386.exe
>
> The Linux version is not crippled.
>
>> The installer told me I wa
Gary Gregory wrote:
> I just tried to install the IBM 1.5.0 JDK I found here:
> http://download.lenovo.com/ibmdl/pub/pc/pccbbs/thinkvantage_en/ibm-java2-
ibmpc-jre-50-win-i386.exe
The Linux version is not crippled.
> The installer told me I was not running on an IBM system and quit. I am on
> a
And my +1.
Gary
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 9:39 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Codec 1.5-RC1
>
> Tag:
>
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/codec/tags/commons-codec-1.5-RC1
>
> Site:
>
> http://people.apache.org/builds/commons
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>
>> Hi Gary,
>>
>> fails for me with latest IBM JDK for 1.5:
>>
>> === %< ===
>> $ java -version
>> java version "1.5.0"
>>
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 3/24/11 6:39 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Codec 1.5-RC1
> >
> > Tag:
> >
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/codec/tags/commons-codec-1.5-RC1
> >
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Hi Gary,
>
> fails for me with latest IBM JDK for 1.5:
>
> === %< ===
> $ java -version
> java version "1.5.0"
> Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build
> pxa64de
. I don't think this is
> blocking.
>
Yes, some source files are in UTF-8 to account for German characters in
Javadoc comments and test sources. Fixed in SVN.
> So +1.
>
Roger that!
Gary
>
> Oliver
>
> Am 25.03.2011 02:39, schrieb Gary Gregory:
>
> [VO
On 3/24/11 6:39 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Codec 1.5-RC1
>
> Tag:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/codec/tags/commons-codec-1.5-RC1
>
> Site:
>
> http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/codec/1.5/RC1/site/index.h
Hi Gary,
fails for me with latest IBM JDK for 1.5:
=== %< ===
$ java -version
java version "1.5.0"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build pxa64devifx-20110224
(SR12 FP4 ))
IBM J9 VM (build 2.3, J2RE 1.5.0 IBM J9 2.3
hrieb Gary Gregory:
[VOTE] Release Apache Commons Codec 1.5-RC1
Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/codec/tags/commons-codec-1.5-RC1
Site:
http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/codec/1.5/RC1/site/index.html
Binaries:
https://repository.apache.org/content/reposit
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 10:18 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 25 March 2011 01:39, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Codec 1.5-RC1
> >
> > Tag:
> >
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/codec/tags/commons-codec-1.5-RC1
> >
On 25 March 2011 01:39, Gary Gregory wrote:
> [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Codec 1.5-RC1
>
> Tag:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/codec/tags/commons-codec-1.5-RC1
>
> Site:
>
> http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/codec/1.5/RC1/site/index.h
[VOTE] Release Apache Commons Codec 1.5-RC1
Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/codec/tags/commons-codec-1.5-RC1
Site:
http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/codec/1.5/RC1/site/index.html
Binaries:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-041
80 matches
Mail list logo
