Re: [VOTE] Log4j2 2.0-beta6 rc1

2013-05-06 Thread Gary Gregory
Sorry about any double posting, it seems I did not "Reply All" on my 1st try... arg. Gary On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Again, Gary? ;-) > > > 2013/5/6 Gary Gregory > > > Hi All: > > > > -1, see below WRT missing license headers. > > > > - I just fixed the FindBugs

Re: [VOTE] Log4j2 2.0-beta6 rc1

2013-05-06 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Again, Gary? ;-) 2013/5/6 Gary Gregory > Hi All: > > -1, see below WRT missing license headers. > > - I just fixed the FindBugs issue from > https://people.apache.org/~rgoers/log4j2/log4j-api/findbugs.html > BugCategoryDetailsLinePriority Argument of type String can't be handled by > format spe

RE: [VOTE] Log4j2 2.0-beta6 rc1

2013-05-06 Thread Gary Gregory
Hi All: -1, see below WRT missing license headers. - I just fixed the FindBugs issue from https://people.apache.org/~rgoers/log4j2/log4j-api/findbugs.html BugCategoryDetailsLinePriority Argument of type String can't be handled by format specifier %d in new org.apache.logging.log4j.message.Structu