On 23 November 2016 at 13:47, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
> [Note: this is the Commons PMC vote on dev@commons - there's a
> concurrent IPMC VOTE thread on general@incubator]
>
> Please VOTE on graduating Commons RDF as new component:
Thanks to everyone who voted! The results from the Commons PMC
+1
Oliver
Am 23.11.2016 um 14:47 schrieb Stian Soiland-Reyes:
> [Note: this is the Commons PMC vote on dev@commons - there's a
> concurrent IPMC VOTE thread on general@incubator]
>
> Since Commons RDF entered incubation, it has evolved the understanding
> of its purpose, developed and released c
Fair enough. Thanks.
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Bernd Eckenfels
wrote:
> (... sorry got interrupted)
> ... there are arguments for a commons component, but it could also be
> arguments having a dedicated community. So I wanted to express that with an
> abstain.
>
> Gruss
> Bernd
> --
> htt
(... sorry got interrupted)
... there are arguments for a commons component, but it could also be arguments
having a dedicated community. So I wanted to express that with an abstain.
Gruss
Bernd
--
http://bernd.eckenfels.net
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 4:02 PM +0100, "Bernd Eckenfels"
wrote:
Hello,
Thank you for the summmary. I was aware of the incubation and the discussion on
rdf-dev. There are arguments for a common component,
Gruss
Bernd
--
http://bernd.eckenfels.net
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:05 PM +0100, "Sergio Fernández"
wrote:
Hi Bern
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 a
Hi Bern
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 8:12 PM, Bernd Eckenfels
wrote:
> +0 Undecided as there where no activity on commons-dev it feels to me
> like an other home would be better
>
That topic was already discussed:
http://markmail.org/message/u6wumpabst35xknn
Basically we felt Commons RDF was in a t
+0 Undecided as there where no activity on commons-dev it feels to me
like an other home would be better
Am Wed, 23 Nov
2016 13:47:03 + schrieb Stian Soiland-Reyes :
> [Note: this is the Commons PMC vote on dev@commons - there's a
> concurrent IPMC VOTE thread on general@incubator]
>
> Since
[x] +1 Yes, accept Commons RDF as new component
Bruno
>
> From: Stian Soiland-Reyes
>To: Commons Developers List
>Sent: Thursday, 24 November 2016 2:47 AM
>Subject: [VOTE] Accept Commons RDF as a new component
>
>
>[Note: this is the
Stian Soiland-Reyes schrieb am Mi., 23. Nov. 2016 um
14:49 Uhr:
> [Note: this is the Commons PMC vote on dev@commons - there's a
> concurrent IPMC VOTE thread on general@incubator]
>
> Since Commons RDF entered incubation, it has evolved the understanding
> of its purpose, developed and released
+1
Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
> [Note: this is the Commons PMC vote on dev@commons - there's a
> concurrent IPMC VOTE thread on general@incubator]
>
> Since Commons RDF entered incubation, it has evolved the understanding
> of its purpose, developed and released code base that is now
> stabilizi
+1
> On Nov 23, 2016, at 10:37 AM, Jochen Wiedmann
> wrote:
>
> +1 (Binding)
>
>
>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes
>> wrote:
>> [Note: this is the Commons PMC vote on dev@commons - there's a
>> concurrent IPMC VOTE thread on general@incubator]
>>
>> Since Commons RDF
+1 (Binding)
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
> [Note: this is the Commons PMC vote on dev@commons - there's a
> concurrent IPMC VOTE thread on general@incubator]
>
> Since Commons RDF entered incubation, it has evolved the understanding
> of its purpose, developed and
[Note: this is the Commons PMC vote on dev@commons - there's a
concurrent IPMC VOTE thread on general@incubator]
Since Commons RDF entered incubation, it has evolved the understanding
of its purpose, developed and released code base that is now
stabilizing, moving towards a 1.0.0 release.
Althoug
13 matches
Mail list logo
