Re: [VOTE][io] Release Commons IO 2.1-RC6

2011-10-06 Thread Gary Gregory
My +1 Gary On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > Good day to you all: > > I have prepared Commons IO 2.1-RC6. > > The differences with RC5 are: > > - build.xml: Pick up Sebb's fix for the JUnit download mess. > > Tag: > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/io/tags/c

Re: [VOTE][io] Release Commons IO 2.1-RC6

2011-10-04 Thread Jörg Schaible
Gary Gregory wrote: > Good day to you all: > > I have prepared Commons IO 2.1-RC6. > > The differences with RC5 are: > > - build.xml: Pick up Sebb's fix for the JUnit download mess. > > Tag: > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/io/tags/commons-io-2.1-RC6 > > Site: > > https:/

Re: [VOTE][io] Release Commons IO 2.1-RC6

2011-10-04 Thread Gary Gregory
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > +1 > thanks for the hard work Gary! > YW :) Gary > Simo > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > > On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Oliver Heger > wrote: > > Both ant and maven builds work fine with Java

Re: [VOTE][io] Release Commons IO 2.1-RC6

2011-10-04 Thread Simone Tripodi
+1 thanks for the hard work Gary! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Oliver Heger wrote: > Both ant and maven builds work fine with Java 1.5 under Windows 7. Artifacts > look good. The link to the site provided below is obvious

Re: [VOTE][io] Release Commons IO 2.1-RC6

2011-10-04 Thread Oliver Heger
Both ant and maven builds work fine with Java 1.5 under Windows 7. Artifacts look good. The link to the site provided below is obviously not correct, but I built it locally and it is fine. So +1 Oliver Am 03.10.2011 23:35, schrieb Gary Gregory: Good day to you all: I have prepared Commons I

Re: [VOTE][io] Release Commons IO 2.1-RC6

2011-10-03 Thread sebb
On 4 October 2011 02:40, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 10/3/11 6:32 PM, sebb wrote: >> On 4 October 2011 02:15, Phil Steitz wrote: >>> On 10/3/11 6:13 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: Sigs, hashes are good. Contents look good. Ant and Maven builds run clean on Sun 1.5, 1.6, Jrockit 1.5, 1.6,

Re: [VOTE][io] Release Commons IO 2.1-RC6

2011-10-03 Thread Phil Steitz
On 10/3/11 6:32 PM, sebb wrote: > On 4 October 2011 02:15, Phil Steitz wrote: >> On 10/3/11 6:13 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: >>> Sigs, hashes are good. >>> Contents look good. >>> Ant and Maven builds run clean on Sun 1.5, 1.6, Jrockit 1.5, 1.6, >>> Apple 1.6 >>> Release notes look good. >>> >>> +1 >>>

Re: [VOTE][io] Release Commons IO 2.1-RC6

2011-10-03 Thread sebb
On 4 October 2011 02:15, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 10/3/11 6:13 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: >> Sigs, hashes are good. >> Contents look good. >> Ant and Maven builds run clean on Sun 1.5, 1.6, Jrockit 1.5, 1.6, >> Apple 1.6 >> Release notes look good. >> >> +1 >> >> Nice work! >> >> Remember to get rid of

Re: [VOTE][io] Release Commons IO 2.1-RC6

2011-10-03 Thread Phil Steitz
On 10/3/11 6:13 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > Sigs, hashes are good. > Contents look good. > Ant and Maven builds run clean on Sun 1.5, 1.6, Jrockit 1.5, 1.6, > Apple 1.6 > Release notes look good. > > +1 > > Nice work! > > Remember to get rid of the cruft before moving the release files to > /dist. > I

Re: [VOTE][io] Release Commons IO 2.1-RC6

2011-10-03 Thread Phil Steitz
Sigs, hashes are good. Contents look good. Ant and Maven builds run clean on Sun 1.5, 1.6, Jrockit 1.5, 1.6, Apple 1.6 Release notes look good. +1 Nice work! Remember to get rid of the cruft before moving the release files to /dist. I am assuming that what we are actually voting on (and what wil

[VOTE][io] Release Commons IO 2.1-RC6

2011-10-03 Thread Gary Gregory
Good day to you all: I have prepared Commons IO 2.1-RC6. The differences with RC5 are: - build.xml: Pick up Sebb's fix for the JUnit download mess. Tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/io/tags/commons-io-2.1-RC6 Site: https://people.apache.org/builds/commons/io/2.1/RC6/ Bina