[CANCEL][VOTE][io] Release Commons IO 2.1-RC4

2011-10-02 Thread Gary Gregory
This vote is canceled. Ant build refers to JUnit 3.x. I'll fix that and see if I can reproduce the tailer fail. Thank you, Gary On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 8:57 AM, sebb wrote: > On 1 October 2011 12:54, Jörg Schaible wrote: > > Hi Hen, > > > > Henri Yandell wrote: > > > >> -1. > >> > >> I got th

Re: [VOTE][io] Release Commons IO 2.1-RC4

2011-10-01 Thread sebb
On 1 October 2011 12:54, Jörg Schaible wrote: > Hi Hen, > > Henri Yandell wrote: > >> -1. >> >> I got the unit test failure again: >> >> Failed tests:   testTailer(org.apache.commons.io.input.TailerTest): >> fileNotFound should not be called expected:<0> but was:<1> >> >> Tests run: 4, Failures: 1

Re: [VOTE][io] Release Commons IO 2.1-RC4

2011-10-01 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Hen, Henri Yandell wrote: > -1. > > I got the unit test failure again: > > Failed tests: testTailer(org.apache.commons.io.input.TailerTest): > fileNotFound should not be called expected:<0> but was:<1> > > Tests run: 4, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 1.959 > sec <<< FAI

Re: [VOTE][io] Release Commons IO 2.1-RC4

2011-10-01 Thread Henri Yandell
-1. I got the unit test failure again: Failed tests: testTailer(org.apache.commons.io.input.TailerTest): fileNotFound should not be called expected:<0> but was:<1> Tests run: 4, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 1.959 sec <<< FAILURE! testTailer(org.apache.commons.io.input.Tail

Re: [VOTE][io] Release Commons IO 2.1-RC4

2011-09-30 Thread Oliver Heger
Build works fine with Java 1.5 on Windows 7, artifacts and site look good. +1 Oliver Am 29.09.2011 14:58, schrieb Gary Gregory: Good day to you all: I have prepared Commons IO 2.1 RC4. The difference with RC3 is that this RC contains up-to-date RELEASE-NOTES.txt Tag: https://svn.apache.org

Re: [VOTE][io] Release Commons IO 2.1-RC4

2011-09-29 Thread Jörg Schaible
Gary Gregory wrote: > Good day to you all: > > I have prepared Commons IO 2.1 RC4. > > The difference with RC3 is that this RC contains up-to-date > RELEASE-NOTES.txt > > Tag: > > https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/io/tags/commons-io-2.1-RC4/ > > Site: > > https://people.apache.org

[VOTE][io] Release Commons IO 2.1-RC4

2011-09-29 Thread Gary Gregory
Resending from my Apache account, the message did not make it to the ML for some reason. Arg. -- Forwarded message -- From: Gary Gregory Date: Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 8:58 AM Subject: [VOTE][io] Release Commons IO 2.1-RC4 To: Commons Developers List Good day to you all: I have

Re: [VOTE][io] Release Commons IO 2.1-RC4

2011-09-29 Thread Gary Gregory
Pardon my bad link, binaries are here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-005/ Gary On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > Good day to you all: > > I have prepared Commons IO 2.1 RC4. > > The difference with RC3 is that this RC contains up-to-date

[VOTE][io] Release Commons IO 2.1-RC4

2011-09-29 Thread Gary Gregory
Good day to you all: I have prepared Commons IO 2.1 RC4. The difference with RC3 is that this RC contains up-to-date RELEASE-NOTES.txt Tag: https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/io/tags/commons-io-2.1-RC4/ Site: https://people.apache.org/builds/commons/io/2.1/RC4/ Binaries: https://r