So you're -0?
On Feb 29, 2012 3:38 PM, "sebb" wrote:
> On 29 February 2012 20:34, Oliver Heger
> wrote:
> > -0
> >
> > I can understand that we all are keen to work with the latest and
> greatest
> > technology. Therefore, if we really needed a feature of a newer JDK, I
> would
> > certainly be
On 29 February 2012 20:34, Oliver Heger wrote:
> -0
>
> I can understand that we all are keen to work with the latest and greatest
> technology. Therefore, if we really needed a feature of a newer JDK, I would
> certainly be +1.
>
> Given the functionality we provide in [lang] and the JDK classes
-0
I can understand that we all are keen to work with the latest and
greatest technology. Therefore, if we really needed a feature of a newer
JDK, I would certainly be +1.
Given the functionality we provide in [lang] and the JDK classes we use,
IMHO the minor differences between JDK 1.6 and
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 1:37 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 27 February 2012 23:08, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 11:53 PM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 27 February 2012 21:16, Gary Gregory wrote:
Hello All:
This VOTE is to update the platform requirement for Commons Lang tru
On 27 February 2012 23:08, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 11:53 PM, sebb wrote:
>> On 27 February 2012 21:16, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>> Hello All:
>>>
>>> This VOTE is to update the platform requirement for Commons Lang trunk to
>>> Java 6 from Java 5.
>>>
>>> The reasons are
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 11:53 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 27 February 2012 21:16, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> Hello All:
>>
>> This VOTE is to update the platform requirement for Commons Lang trunk to
>> Java 6 from Java 5.
>>
>> The reasons are:
>>
>> - Stop wasting time back porting code contributions from
+1 - Original Message -From: "Gary Gregory"
>;ggreg...@apache.org;http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
volunteers maintaining [lang] have to work in the more comfortable
conditions they need - if keeping the Java5 backward compatibility
became more a pain than something to enjoy in their spare time,
there's no reason to continue getting crazy with the risk they lose
the interest - and [lang] won't b
