Re: [VFS] change of package name breaks Gump

2010-11-14 Thread Gary Gregory
On Nov 14, 2010, at 20:08, "Ralph Goers" wrote: > > On Nov 14, 2010, at 7:43 PM, sebb wrote: > >> On 15 November 2010 02:08, Ralph Goers wrote: >>> >>> On Nov 14, 2010, at 5:51 PM, sebb wrote: >>> On 15 November 2010 01:38, Ralph Goers wrote: > > On Nov 14, 2010, at 5:34 PM, s

Re: [VFS] change of package name breaks Gump

2010-11-14 Thread sebb
On 15 November 2010 04:07, Ralph Goers wrote: > > On Nov 14, 2010, at 7:43 PM, sebb wrote: > >> On 15 November 2010 02:08, Ralph Goers wrote: >>> >>> On Nov 14, 2010, at 5:51 PM, sebb wrote: >>> On 15 November 2010 01:38, Ralph Goers wrote: > > On Nov 14, 2010, at 5:34 PM, sebb wrot

Re: [VFS] change of package name breaks Gump

2010-11-14 Thread Ralph Goers
On Nov 14, 2010, at 7:43 PM, sebb wrote: > On 15 November 2010 02:08, Ralph Goers wrote: >> >> On Nov 14, 2010, at 5:51 PM, sebb wrote: >> >>> On 15 November 2010 01:38, Ralph Goers wrote: On Nov 14, 2010, at 5:34 PM, sebb wrote: > > > IMO it's important to ensu

Re: [VFS] change of package name breaks Gump

2010-11-14 Thread sebb
On 15 November 2010 02:08, Ralph Goers wrote: > > On Nov 14, 2010, at 5:51 PM, sebb wrote: > >> On 15 November 2010 01:38, Ralph Goers wrote: >>> >>> On Nov 14, 2010, at 5:34 PM, sebb wrote: >>> IMO it's important to ensure that the package change really is necessary. >>> >>>

Re: [VFS] change of package name breaks Gump

2010-11-14 Thread Ralph Goers
On Nov 14, 2010, at 5:51 PM, sebb wrote: > On 15 November 2010 01:38, Ralph Goers wrote: >> >> On Nov 14, 2010, at 5:34 PM, sebb wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> IMO it's important to ensure that the package change really is necessary. >>> >> >> Somehow I thought that was accomplished by the last rel

Re: [VFS] change of package name breaks Gump

2010-11-14 Thread sebb
On 15 November 2010 01:38, Ralph Goers wrote: > > On Nov 14, 2010, at 5:34 PM, sebb wrote: > >> >> >> IMO it's important to ensure that the package change really is necessary. >> > > Somehow I thought that was accomplished by the last release candidate failing > to get the required votes due to t

Re: [VFS] change of package name breaks Gump

2010-11-14 Thread Ralph Goers
On Nov 14, 2010, at 5:34 PM, sebb wrote: > > > IMO it's important to ensure that the package change really is necessary. > Somehow I thought that was accomplished by the last release candidate failing to get the required votes due to the package name not being changed. If the recommendatio

Re: [VFS] change of package name breaks Gump

2010-11-14 Thread sebb
On 15 November 2010 01:23, Ralph Goers wrote: > > On Nov 14, 2010, at 3:43 AM, sebb wrote: > >> On 14 November 2010 11:17, sebb wrote: >>> The change of VFS package name has broken lots of Gump builds - which >>> is to be expected. >>> >>> Looking at how this has been solved for other projects, o

Re: [VFS] change of package name breaks Gump

2010-11-14 Thread Ralph Goers
On Nov 14, 2010, at 3:43 AM, sebb wrote: > On 14 November 2010 11:17, sebb wrote: >> The change of VFS package name has broken lots of Gump builds - which >> is to be expected. >> >> Looking at how this has been solved for other projects, one way to >> solve this is to create a branch for the V

Re: [VFS] change of package name breaks Gump

2010-11-14 Thread sebb
On 14 November 2010 11:17, sebb wrote: > The change of VFS package name has broken lots of Gump builds - which > is to be expected. > > Looking at how this has been solved for other projects, one way to > solve this is to create a branch for the VFS 1.x code and use that for > the current VFS. > T

[VFS] change of package name breaks Gump

2010-11-14 Thread sebb
The change of VFS package name has broken lots of Gump builds - which is to be expected. Looking at how this has been solved for other projects, one way to solve this is to create a branch for the VFS 1.x code and use that for the current VFS. Then we create a build for VFS 2. Gump does warn us t