Re: [VFS] artifactid

2010-11-13 Thread James Carman
Peachtree Road, Suite 820 . Atlanta, GA 30326 . USA > Tel: +1.404.760.1560 > Email: ggreg...@seagullsoftware.com > Web: seagull.rocketsoftware.com > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Ralph Goers [mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com] >> Sent: Friday, No

RE: [VFS] artifactid

2010-11-13 Thread Gary Gregory
m Web: seagull.rocketsoftware.com  > -Original Message- > From: Ralph Goers [mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com] > Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 21:56 > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: [VFS] artifactid > > I've changed the package name from org.commons.vfs to org.commons.vfs2. &

Re: [VFS] artifactid

2010-11-13 Thread Dennis Lundberg
On 2010-11-13 15:00, James Carman wrote: > Change it to be consistent. We've had this discussion before. +1 Consistence is a good thing. > > On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 12:56 AM, Ralph Goers > wrote: >> I've changed the package name from org.commons.vfs to org.commons.vfs2. >> However, it isn't

Re: [VFS] artifactid

2010-11-13 Thread James Carman
Change it to be consistent. We've had this discussion before. On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 12:56 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > I've changed the package name from org.commons.vfs to org.commons.vfs2.   > However, it isn't necessary to change the artifact id from commons-vfs to > commons-vfs2 since we are

Re: [VFS] artifactid

2010-11-13 Thread sebb
On 13 November 2010 05:56, Ralph Goers wrote: > I've changed the package name from org.commons.vfs to org.commons.vfs2.   > However, it isn't necessary to change the artifact id from commons-vfs to > commons-vfs2 since we are changing the groupId already.  The only reason to > do it is to have i

[VFS] artifactid

2010-11-12 Thread Ralph Goers
I've changed the package name from org.commons.vfs to org.commons.vfs2. However, it isn't necessary to change the artifact id from commons-vfs to commons-vfs2 since we are changing the groupId already. The only reason to do it is to have it match the package name. Thoughts? Ralph ---