I ended up adding versioning support for WebDAV without using operations. Now
you have me wondering if I should have used it.
Ralph
On Jun 22, 2012, at 10:59 AM, Mark Fortner wrote:
> I think the idea was to implement functionality that doesn't fit with what
> File Systems do, in this version c
I think the idea was to implement functionality that doesn't fit with what
File Systems do, in this version control system operations. So that
operations like update, commit, revert, etc could be supported. I too,
implemented something on top of SVNKit (for an internal project), and
another proje
I'm not sure why SVN support would require the operations stuff. I actually
implemented an SVN provider at one point but didn't commit it here due to the
svnkit license.
Ralph
On Jun 22, 2012, at 7:49 AM, Mark Fortner wrote:
> Gary,
> The S3 provider has an implementation
> https://github.com/
Gary,
The S3 provider has an implementation
https://github.com/abashev/vfs-s3/tree/master/src/main/java/com/intridea/io/vfs/provider/s3/operations
You'd probably need to talk with Mario about specifics. From what I can
tell, it's basically an implementation of the Command pattern with the
impleme
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
>
> On Jun 21, 2012, at 2:41 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Mark Fortner
> wrote:
> >
> >> Gary,
> >> There was some talk a while back about implementing File System-specific
> >> Operations. I think what Mario
On Jun 21, 2012, at 2:41 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Mark Fortner wrote:
>
>> Gary,
>> There was some talk a while back about implementing File System-specific
>> Operations. I think what Mario had in mind was supporting version control
>> system functionality t
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Mark Fortner wrote:
> Gary,
> There was some talk a while back about implementing File System-specific
> Operations. I think what Mario had in mind was supporting version control
> system functionality through VFS. It strikes me that this might be the
> best way
Gary,
There was some talk a while back about implementing File System-specific
Operations. I think what Mario had in mind was supporting version control
system functionality through VFS. It strikes me that this might be the
best way for implementing functionality that makes use of the JSch bells
Hi All:
WRT VFS-422: [SFTP] Allows to create other channels in SftpFileSystem (
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-422)
I'll like to solicit feedback from the list on this issue. I've cleaned up
the proposed patch in the ticket and attached it back to the issue as
https://issues.apache.org