On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 8:10 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> On Dec 21, 2010, at 4:11 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Ralph Goers >wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> I would say that is up to the RM :)
>
> Did you add the above comment? It wasn't in my original email.
>
> Yes. De
On Dec 21, 2010, at 5:10 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> On Dec 21, 2010, at 4:11 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Ralph Goers
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I would say that is up to the RM :)
>
> Did you add the above comment? It wasn't in my original email.
>
>>
>> I
On Dec 21, 2010, at 4:11 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Ralph Goers
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> I would say that is up to the RM :)
Did you add the above comment? It wasn't in my original email.
>
> I personally don't have a problem with the out-of-synch condition. What
Stick one in the m2 snapshot repository on p.o.a and point
Configuration to that.
There's no release process for those, they're akin to nightly builds.
Hen
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 6:19 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> If we aren't going to release real soon is there any process for publishing
> a SNAPS
Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Sergey Vladimirov wrote:
>
>> Personally, I would like to see some issues to be resolved before 2.0
>> release, because they can create incompatibility with previous releases
>> in some way.
>> - VFS-169 is the example of such issue (changing default behavior of
>> toString
If we aren't going to release real soon is there any process for
publishing a SNAPSHOT? I have a bunch of stuff for Configuration I'd
really like to commit but I can't because Commons Configuration will
now have a dependency on Commons VFS 2.0-SNAPSHOT.
Ralph
On Mar 21, 2009, at 4:55 PM, J
Sergey Vladimirov wrote:
> Personally, I would like to see some issues to be resolved before 2.0
> release, because they can create incompatibility with previous releases in
> some way.
> - VFS-169 is the example of such issue (changing default behavior of
> toString() to use friendly URI)
this i
Personally, I would like to see some issues to be resolved before 2.0
release, because they can create incompatibility with previous releases in
some way.
- VFS-169 is the example of such issue (changing default behavior of
toString() to use friendly URI)
- VFS-203 (if it's going to be fixed at all
On 17/03/2009, sebb wrote:
> On 17/03/2009, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> > Actually, the tests are (correctly) run many times. VFS uses an interesting
> > mechanism to run the tests once for each provider type. It took me quite a
> > while to figure out what it was doing. Some providers, such as webd
On 17/03/2009, Ralph Goers wrote:
> Actually, the tests are (correctly) run many times. VFS uses an interesting
> mechanism to run the tests once for each provider type. It took me quite a
> while to figure out what it was doing. Some providers, such as webdav, http
> and ftp have to be run manual
Actually, the tests are (correctly) run many times. VFS uses an
interesting mechanism to run the tests once for each provider type. It
took me quite a while to figure out what it was doing. Some providers,
such as webdav, http and ftp have to be run manually. I've put
instructions in the do
On 17/03/2009, sebb wrote:
> On 17/03/2009, Siegfried Goeschl wrote:
> > Hi Ralph,
> >
> > +) I'm unable to run "mvn test" on commons-vfs (see below) SVN trunk
> > +) you can deploy a SNAPSHOT using "mvn -Pci deploy"
>
>
> Surely you just have to run
>
> mvn install
>
> to deploy it to yo
On 17/03/2009, Siegfried Goeschl wrote:
> Hi Ralph,
>
> +) I'm unable to run "mvn test" on commons-vfs (see below) SVN trunk
> +) you can deploy a SNAPSHOT using "mvn -Pci deploy"
Surely you just have to run
mvn install
to deploy it to your local repo?
> Cheers,
>
> Siegfried Goeschl
>
>
Hi Ralph,
+) I'm unable to run "mvn test" on commons-vfs (see below) SVN trunk
+) you can deploy a SNAPSHOT using "mvn -Pci deploy"
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
=== START ===
Downloading:
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository//org/apache/commons/commons-vfs/2.0-SNAPSHOT/commons-vfs
On 17/03/2009, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> On Mar 16, 2009, at 5:32 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>
> > On 16/03/2009, Ralph Goers wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On Mar 16, 2009, at 3:31 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > Hi Ralph,
> > > >
> > > > Ralph Goers wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > I ha
On Mar 16, 2009, at 5:32 PM, sebb wrote:
On 16/03/2009, Ralph Goers wrote:
On Mar 16, 2009, at 3:31 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Hi Ralph,
Ralph Goers wrote:
I have finished the work to implement webdav versioning support
in VFS
trunk. I would like to take advantage of this in Commons
On 16/03/2009, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> On Mar 16, 2009, at 3:31 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>
>
> > Hi Ralph,
> >
> > Ralph Goers wrote:
> >
> >
> > > I have finished the work to implement webdav versioning support in VFS
> > > trunk. I would like to take advantage of this in Commons Configuration
>
On Mar 16, 2009, at 3:31 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Hi Ralph,
Ralph Goers wrote:
I have finished the work to implement webdav versioning support in
VFS
trunk. I would like to take advantage of this in Commons
Configuration
(that code is also complete) but to do so I need a release of VFS
Hi Ralph,
Ralph Goers wrote:
> I have finished the work to implement webdav versioning support in VFS
> trunk. I would like to take advantage of this in Commons Configuration
> (that code is also complete) but to do so I need a release of VFS 2.0.
> What must be done to accomplish this? FWIW I do
It's not necessary to get the key signed by others before using it to
sign a release.
Just create a key and add it to KEYS and upload it to a key server.
On 16/03/2009, Ralph Goers wrote:
> I'd be happy to do all that. But my understanding is that I can't do the
> release until all those steps a
I'd be happy to do all that. But my understanding is that I can't do
the release until all those steps are completed. I'd really like VFS
2.0 released asap. Since I'm also not on the PMC I can't even vote for
the release. As far as I can tell I'm the only one committing code
but I know I'm
Hi Ralph,
+) see http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html
+) you can upload your key to a public key server even if it is not
trusted yet
+) afterwards you add it to the KEYS file and commit it
+) you have to join a key signing party at some point in time
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
Ralp
I have finished the work to implement webdav versioning support in VFS
trunk. I would like to take advantage of this in Commons Configuration
(that code is also complete) but to do so I need a release of VFS 2.0.
What must be done to accomplish this? FWIW I don't yet have a PGP key
so I kin
Thanks Ralph.
I am investigating my issue at the moment. Hopefully it is one in the same
and I can submit a patch for it soon.
regards
ramon
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 18:15, Ralph Goers wrote:
> I haven't tried the ftp provider before. I just tried the unit test and am
> getting a "Folder does not
I haven't tried the ftp provider before. I just tried the unit test
and am getting a "Folder does not exist" assertion failure. I'm not
sure why and it is getting fairly let. I'll have to investigate some
more tomorrow when I can.
Ralph
On Feb 4, 2009, at 11:06 PM, Ramon Buckland wrote:
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 17:07, Ralph Goers
wrote:users@
.
> What error are you referring to? The message during the build that says
> webdav isn't configured or something else?
>
>
Sorry Ralph, nothing to worry about. I was commenting, but should have been
clear, that switching from v1.0 to the bu
What error are you referring to? The message during the build that
says webdav isn't configured or something else?
Ralph
On Feb 4, 2009, at 9:13 PM, Ramon Buckland wrote:
Thanks Ralph,
I have grabbed the V2.0 src and built it. (from v1.0 ) (I noticed
the new
webdav error saying I did not
Thanks Ralph,
I have grabbed the V2.0 src and built it. (from v1.0 ) (I noticed the new
webdav error saying I did not have jack rabbit come up).
I'll perform a site and review later this evening and see what i see.
thanks.
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 15:54, Ralph Goers wrote:
> Well, I still have s
Well, I still have some enhancements I need to make to the WebDAV
support which I would prefer to do before the release. I need to
support webdav versioning for my application. I should have this done
within a week.
In the meantime, you could certainly build trunk yourself and test it
as
Hi,
Just wondering if there is a roadmap for the release of 2.0. On the maven
ibiblio.org repository the latest release is 1.0 and that is terribly old,
but it appears there has not been any release since then.
Is there stuff that needs to be sorted out ? I can certainly lend a hand.
regards
ram
30 matches
Mail list logo
