Re: [VALIDATOR] Proposal for a JSR-303 Bean Validation Implementation

2009-09-08 Thread Mohammad Nour El-Din
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 11:58 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Mohammad Nour > El-Din wrote: >> I support either solution 1 or 2 from first section of solutions: >> >> 1- We will not be waiting for others till they decide whether donate >> the code or not. > > RH don

Re: [VALIDATOR] Proposal for a JSR-303 Bean Validation Implementation

2009-09-08 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote: > I support either solution 1 or 2 from first section of solutions: > > 1- We will not be waiting for others till they decide whether donate > the code or not. RH donation will not happen - we could fork, the license is just fine for it.

Re: [VALIDATOR] Proposal for a JSR-303 Bean Validation Implementation

2009-09-08 Thread Donald Woods
Thanks for the input. I'd prefer to continue using the validator2 sandbox, so other Commons committers and users will be aware of the project and provide help/reviews when they can. -Donald Niall Pemberton wrote: On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 7:18 PM, Donald Woods wrote: Niall Pemberton wrote:

Re: [VALIDATOR] Proposal for a JSR-303 Bean Validation Implementation

2009-09-07 Thread Mohammad Nour El-Din
You already created location for this Nial on SVN and Donal knows about it. On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 7:18 PM, Donald Woods wrote: >> >> >> Niall Pemberton wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Donald Woods wrote: Everyone,

Re: [VALIDATOR] Proposal for a JSR-303 Bean Validation Implementation

2009-09-07 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 7:18 PM, Donald Woods wrote: > > > Niall Pemberton wrote: >> >> On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Donald Woods wrote: >>> >>> Everyone, I think it is time again to reopen the discussions around >>> creating >>> a Validator2 release [1], which implements the upcoming JSR-303 B

Re: [VALIDATOR] Proposal for a JSR-303 Bean Validation Implementation

2009-09-06 Thread Donald Woods
Niall Pemberton wrote: On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Donald Woods wrote: Everyone, I think it is time again to reopen the discussions around creating a Validator2 release [1], which implements the upcoming JSR-303 Bean Validation spec [2] and [3]. Since JSR-303 is now a required component

Re: [VALIDATOR] Proposal for a JSR-303 Bean Validation Implementation

2009-09-05 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Donald Woods wrote: > Everyone, I think it is time again to reopen the discussions around creating > a Validator2 release [1], which implements the upcoming JSR-303 Bean > Validation spec [2] and [3].  Since JSR-303 is now a required component of > Java EE 6 applica

Re: [VALIDATOR] Proposal for a JSR-303 Bean Validation Implementation

2009-09-04 Thread Mohammad Nour El-Din
I support either solution 1 or 2 from first section of solutions: 1- We will not be waiting for others till they decide whether donate the code or not. 2- We will get more benefit for ASF as we may gain more committer to join the community and help grow it more. 3- For the non-committers contrib

[VALIDATOR] Proposal for a JSR-303 Bean Validation Implementation

2009-09-04 Thread Donald Woods
Everyone, I think it is time again to reopen the discussions around creating a Validator2 release [1], which implements the upcoming JSR-303 Bean Validation spec [2] and [3]. Since JSR-303 is now a required component of Java EE 6 application servers and must be supported by JSR-314 JSF2 and JS