Agreed.
-Rob
> On Feb 7, 2017, at 11:38 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Agreed!
>
> Gary
>
>> On Feb 7, 2017 8:36 AM, "sebb" wrote:
>>
>> It occurs to me that the beta release will not be source or binary
>> compatible with the first GA release (assuming that this drops the
>> .beta package na
Agreed!
Gary
On Feb 7, 2017 8:36 AM, "sebb" wrote:
> It occurs to me that the beta release will not be source or binary
> compatible with the first GA release (assuming that this drops the
> .beta package name segment).
>
> I don't think this is a problem, but we do need to make it very clear
>
It occurs to me that the beta release will not be source or binary
compatible with the first GA release (assuming that this drops the
.beta package name segment).
I don't think this is a problem, but we do need to make it very clear
in the release notes and the announce and on the download page th
