Re: [SCXML] Tidy up test cases

2011-05-27 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 7:06 PM, sebb wrote: > On 26 May 2011 14:46, Rahul Akolkar wrote: >> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 9:24 AM, sebb wrote: >>> On 23 May 2011 16:22, Rahul Akolkar wrote: On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 8:16 AM, sebb wrote: > SCXML has had a couple of ongoing Gump failures, whic

Re: [SCXML] Tidy up test cases

2011-05-26 Thread sebb
On 26 May 2011 14:46, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 9:24 AM, sebb wrote: >> On 23 May 2011 16:22, Rahul Akolkar wrote: >>> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 8:16 AM, sebb wrote: SCXML has had a couple of ongoing Gump failures, which I started to look at again. >>> >>> Than

Re: [SCXML] Tidy up test cases

2011-05-26 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 9:24 AM, sebb wrote: > On 23 May 2011 16:22, Rahul Akolkar wrote: >> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 8:16 AM, sebb wrote: >>> SCXML has had a couple of ongoing Gump failures, which I started to >>> look at again. >>> >> >> Thanks, the initial breakage was from EL trunk changes, i

Re: [SCXML] Tidy up test cases

2011-05-26 Thread sebb
On 23 May 2011 16:22, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 8:16 AM, sebb wrote: >> SCXML has had a couple of ongoing Gump failures, which I started to >> look at again. >> > > > Thanks, the initial breakage was from EL trunk changes, if you follow > this trail (if you've begun to look

Re: [SCXML] Tidy up test cases

2011-05-23 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:41 AM, sebb wrote: > On 23 May 2011 16:22, Rahul Akolkar wrote: >> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 8:16 AM, sebb wrote: >>> [As part of this, I noticed and fixed some minor issues in the Ant build >>> file.] >>> >> >> I understand some of the changes you've made, but can't g

Re: [SCXML] Tidy up test cases

2011-05-23 Thread sebb
On 23 May 2011 16:22, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 8:16 AM, sebb wrote: >> SCXML has had a couple of ongoing Gump failures, which I started to >> look at again. >> > > > Thanks, the initial breakage was from EL trunk changes, if you follow > this trail (if you've begun to look

Re: [SCXML] Tidy up test cases

2011-05-23 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 8:16 AM, sebb wrote: > SCXML has had a couple of ongoing Gump failures, which I started to > look at again. > Thanks, the initial breakage was from EL trunk changes, if you follow this trail (if you've begun to look into it, this probably won't be new information): htt

[SCXML] Tidy up test cases

2011-05-23 Thread sebb
SCXML has had a couple of ongoing Gump failures, which I started to look at again. [As part of this, I noticed and fixed some minor issues in the Ant build file.] The component currently uses nested test suites (and main() methods) which are unnecessary. They also make finding the errors harder,