Hi.
On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 01:38:16 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 15/09/2016 à 16:37, Gilles a écrit :
I don't understand "motivations for the API".
I just mean a short introduction to the component, something
explaining
why it exists, its usefulness (performance, randomness quality), the
i
Le 15/09/2016 à 16:37, Gilles a écrit :
> I don't understand "motivations for the API".
I just mean a short introduction to the component, something explaining
why it exists, its usefulness (performance, randomness quality), the
implementations supported, etc.
> I won't do that.
> It was alread
After scanning this, I am wondering if a smoother path to 1.0 would be
really be through a beta or alpha release. The code is all there, any one
can look at it.
The advantage of a beta release is that it gets pushed out as a ANNOUNCE
email and might get more notice. YMMV.
Gary
On Thu, Sep 15, 20
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Gilles
wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Moving to another thread, as your comments do not belong in
> a release vote.
>
> Many of them could lead to interesting discussions that should
> (and could) have happened earlier.
>
> Indeed, for the record, see
> https://issues.apache.
Hi.
Moving to another thread, as your comments do not belong in
a release vote.
Many of them could lead to interesting discussions that should
(and could) have happened earlier.
Indeed, for the record, see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RNG-6
and the numerous posts which I sent to this
