2016-07-15 10:29 GMT+03:00 Jochen Wiedmann :
> Hi,
>
> for the record: This vote has passes with three binding votes (Gary,
> Stian, myself). I am ignoring the opposition voiced by Konstantin
> Kolinko, because I don't think. that Tomcat's got a say. Besides,
> there are several options, that Tomca
On 18 July 2016 07:54:36 CEST, Jochen Wiedmann
wrote:
>On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 7:47 PM, Matt Sicker wrote:
>> They can use the svn mirror on GitHub, too, unless that's against
>Apache
>> policy.
>
>
>Assuming that you are talking about the Tomcat "fork" (it really
>isn't, because there is no dev
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 7:47 PM, Matt Sicker wrote:
> They can use the svn mirror on GitHub, too, unless that's against Apache
> policy.
Assuming that you are talking about the Tomcat "fork" (it really
isn't, because there is no development happening, as far as I am
aware, only pulling from Comm
They can use the svn mirror on GitHub, too, unless that's against Apache
policy.
On 15 July 2016 at 02:29, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> for the record: This vote has passes with three binding votes (Gary,
> Stian, myself). I am ignoring the opposition voiced by Konstantin
> Kolinko, because
Hi,
for the record: This vote has passes with three binding votes (Gary,
Stian, myself). I am ignoring the opposition voiced by Konstantin
Kolinko, because I don't think. that Tomcat's got a say. Besides,
there are several options, that Tomcat can follow:
1.) Use a shaded release jar, rather than
