After receiving some more votes, the vote to release Configuration 2.1
based on RC3 is now successful with the following votes (binding votes
marked with a *):
Gary Gregory: -1 *
Jörg Schaible: +1 *
Oliver Heger: +1 *
Raviteja Lokineni: +1
Benedikt Ritter: +1 *
Thanks for all revi
A vote is normally at least 72 hours, but it can be shorter if announced in
advanced, for a security fix for example.
I do not see a problem with saying that the additional binding vote counts.
You can send another vote result email.
Gary
On Aug 18, 2016 12:48 PM, "Oliver Heger"
wrote:
>
> Am
Am 16.08.2016 um 21:40 schrieb Oliver Heger:
> The vote to release Configuration 2.1 based on RC3 failed with the
> following binding votes:
>
> Gary Gregory: -1
> Jörg Schaible:+1
> Oliver Heger: +1
After closing the vote, two more votes have been cast:
- Raviteja Lokineni: +1 (non-bind
If it's a majority win vote and if my vote counts +1 from me too.
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 6:33 PM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
> You can wait and ask for more reviews too...
>
> Gary
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Oliver Heger <
> oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de
> > wrote:
>
> > The vote to release
You can wait and ask for more reviews too...
Gary
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
> The vote to release Configuration 2.1 based on RC3 failed with the
> following binding votes:
>
> Gary Gregory: -1
> Jörg Schaible: +1
> Oliver Heger: +1
>
> Oliver
>
> Am 11.08.2016 u
The vote to release Configuration 2.1 based on RC3 failed with the
following binding votes:
Gary Gregory: -1
Jörg Schaible: +1
Oliver Heger: +1
Oliver
Am 11.08.2016 um 22:02 schrieb Oliver Heger:
> Hi all,
>
> after the failed votes for RC1 and RC2 a new RC has been created. There
> has
