Re: [RESULT][VOTE] New component: Complex numbers

2016-07-03 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 3/07/2016 à 16:13, Gilles a écrit : > Feel free to fill in any missing names. > People who forgot to vote are welcome to do so. :-) I voted -0, just like the math functions and the rational numbers I still think it should remain grouped in the same component. On the other hand the RNG stuff is

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] New component: Complex numbers

2016-07-03 Thread Rob Tompkins
+1 [contributor] > On Jul 3, 2016, at 10:13 AM, Gilles wrote: > > Vote thread: > http://markmail.org/message/hwcydvqg7v2ypben > > +1 > Gilles Sadowski > Eric Barnhill > Stian Soiland-Reyes > > > Feel free to fill in any missing names. > People who forgot to vote are welcome to do so. :-) >

[RESULT][VOTE] New component: Complex numbers

2016-07-03 Thread Gilles
Vote thread: http://markmail.org/message/hwcydvqg7v2ypben +1 Gilles Sadowski Eric Barnhill Stian Soiland-Reyes Feel free to fill in any missing names. People who forgot to vote are welcome to do so. :-) Regards, Gilles - T