I don't know much about RDF4J but my comments would be
1. Better IMO to add a default method to the interface rather than
adding 11 implementations which are almost identical
2. No need to restrict it to a List when any iterable would do
3. There is a bulk 'add' method in RepositoryConnection
(http
Ah, sorry. i forgot to post this PR here:
https://github.com/apache/commons-rdf/pull/205
I did it right after the mail.
Thanks Fredy
On 10.03.24 13:42, Peter Hull wrote:
On Sat, 9 Mar 2024 at 22:37, Fred Hauschel wrote:
Is there a reason, why there is no Method like GraphLike#add(List
state
On Sat, 9 Mar 2024 at 22:37, Fred Hauschel wrote:
> Is there a reason, why there is no Method like GraphLike#add(List
> statements); ?
It would be possible to add a method with a default implementation to
GraphLike - then look to see if this can be more efficient for
RDF4J (e.g. avoiding the mul
Hi there,
it looks like I am bound to the interface
org.apache.commons.rdf.api.GraphLike#add. And in the RDF4J
implementation, a new connection to the repository is established for
each quad/triple. This is not very useful.
Am I missing another possibility or am I the first to have a problem
