Re: [PROPOSAL] Move Commons Proxy to Proper

2007-09-28 Thread Henri Yandell
Yeah; though personally I think you can start the vote with any of the +1s here as presumed votes. ie) We don't have to revote - just list them in the vote email. Hen On 9/28/07, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What will be the process here? This is merely a proposal, so I guess > we n

Re: [PROPOSAL] Move Commons Proxy to Proper

2007-09-28 Thread James Carman
What will be the process here? This is merely a proposal, so I guess we need an official vote thread started after this. Should I go ahead and start that now? On 9/28/07, Luc Maisonobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 > > Henri Yandell wrote: > > +1 too. > > > > On 9/28/07, Ben Speakmon <[EMAIL P

Re: [PROPOSAL] Move Commons Proxy to Proper

2007-09-28 Thread Luc Maisonobe
+1 Henri Yandell wrote: +1 too. On 9/28/07, Ben Speakmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +1 nonbinding. On 9/28/07, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +1 On 9/28/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +1 - To unsub

Re: [PROPOSAL] Move Commons Proxy to Proper

2007-09-28 Thread Henri Yandell
+1 too. On 9/28/07, Ben Speakmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 nonbinding. > > On 9/28/07, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > On 9/28/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > > -

Re: [PROPOSAL] Move Commons Proxy to Proper

2007-09-28 Thread Ben Speakmon
+1 nonbinding. On 9/28/07, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > +1 > > On 9/28/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > +1 > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EM

Re: [PROPOSAL] Move Commons Proxy to Proper

2007-09-28 Thread James Carman
+1 On 9/28/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PROPOSAL] Move Commons Proxy to Proper

2007-09-28 Thread Paul Benedict
+1

Re: [PROPOSAL] Move Commons Proxy to Proper

2007-09-28 Thread Niall Pemberton
On 4/14/06, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Outside projects (currently my Syringe project and the "Crispy" project > at sourceforge) are beginning to want to use Commons Proxy, but are finding > it difficult since it's in the sandbox and no releases are available. I > believe Proxy's AP