Le 14/07/2010 10:22, Jörg Schaible a écrit :
> sebb wrote:
>
>> There does not seem to be any need for a further release of the NET
>> 1.x line, which is currently the trunk version, so I propose to:
>>
>> * rename trunk as branches/NET_1_x
>> * rename branches/NET_2_0 as trunk
>>
>> Any objection
On 2010-07-12, sebb wrote:
> There does not seem to be any need for a further release of the NET
> 1.x line, which is currently the trunk version, so I propose to:
> * rename trunk as branches/NET_1_x
> * rename branches/NET_2_0 as trunk
+1
A while back the Ant folks were informed that the FTP
sebb wrote:
> There does not seem to be any need for a further release of the NET
> 1.x line, which is currently the trunk version, so I propose to:
>
> * rename trunk as branches/NET_1_x
> * rename branches/NET_2_0 as trunk
>
> Any objections?
+1
it's never good if the head revision is on som
There does not seem to be any need for a further release of the NET
1.x line, which is currently the trunk version, so I propose to:
* rename trunk as branches/NET_1_x
* rename branches/NET_2_0 as trunk
Any objections?
-
To unsu