Hi.
> [...]
> >
> >However, I'm concerned that the "stress" test ("testLinearCombination1")
> >taken from your test case for Vector3D might not be stringent enough. [I
> >think that while changing my implemementation, the test was still passing
> >just before I dicovered that I was using an unitia
Le 06/08/2011 13:15, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
Hi.
[...]
I've allowed myself to adapt your code to an array version of the
accurate "linearCombination" (committed in revision 1154416).
Thanks Gilles,
I wanted to add this too and simply forgot :-(
Here is a micro-benchmark (for an array
Hi.
> > [...]
>
> I've allowed myself to adapt your code to an array version of the
> accurate "linearCombination" (committed in revision 1154416).
>
> Here is a micro-benchmark (for an array of length 3):
> -
> linearCombination (runs per timed block: 1, timed blocks: 1000)
> direct
> [...]
I've allowed myself to adapt your code to an array version of the
accurate "linearCombination" (committed in revision 1154416).
Here is a micro-benchmark (for an array of length 3):
-
linearCombination (runs per timed block: 1, timed blocks: 1000)
direct inline: 1.789185e-05 (1
