On 20 Jun 2014 16:37, "Gilles" wrote:
>
> On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 16:18:08 +0200, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>>
>> Java 5 is already eol. Anybody still using it is certainly in maintenance
>> mode thus adding now a feature that is available in java 6 does not make
>> any sense.
>
>
> This a strong stateme
On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 16:18:08 +0200, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
Java 5 is already eol. Anybody still using it is certainly in
maintenance
mode thus adding now a feature that is available in java 6 does not
make
any sense.
This a strong statement in a forum where it has _always_ been
indicated that
