Re: [Math] Supported Java versions

2014-07-14 Thread Phil Steitz
On 7/13/14, 4:31 PM, Gilles wrote: > On Sat, 12 Jul 2014 09:52:12 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: >> On 7/12/14, 9:33 AM, Gilles wrote: >>> On Sat, 12 Jul 2014 06:54:46 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: On 7/12/14, 6:19 AM, Gilles wrote: > On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 14:52:22 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: >> On

Re: [Math] Supported Java versions

2014-07-13 Thread Gilles
On Sat, 12 Jul 2014 09:52:12 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: On 7/12/14, 9:33 AM, Gilles wrote: On Sat, 12 Jul 2014 06:54:46 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: On 7/12/14, 6:19 AM, Gilles wrote: On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 14:52:22 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: On 6/20/14, 9:56 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: On 06/20/2014

Re: [Math] Supported Java versions

2014-07-12 Thread Phil Steitz
On 7/12/14, 9:33 AM, Gilles wrote: > On Sat, 12 Jul 2014 06:54:46 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: >> On 7/12/14, 6:19 AM, Gilles wrote: >>> On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 14:52:22 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: On 6/20/14, 9:56 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On 06/20/2014 05:30 PM, Gilles wrote: >> On Fri, 20

Re: [Math] Supported Java versions

2014-07-12 Thread Gilles
On Sat, 12 Jul 2014 06:54:46 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: On 7/12/14, 6:19 AM, Gilles wrote: On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 14:52:22 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: On 6/20/14, 9:56 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: On 06/20/2014 05:30 PM, Gilles wrote: On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 16:57:41 +0200, Thomas Neidhart wrote: On 20

Re: [Math] Supported Java versions

2014-07-12 Thread Phil Steitz
On 7/12/14, 6:19 AM, Gilles wrote: > On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 14:52:22 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: >> On 6/20/14, 9:56 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: >>> On 06/20/2014 05:30 PM, Gilles wrote: On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 16:57:41 +0200, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On 20 Jun 2014 16:37, "Gilles" > wrote: >>>

Re: [Math] Supported Java versions

2014-07-12 Thread Gilles
On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 14:52:22 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: On 6/20/14, 9:56 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: On 06/20/2014 05:30 PM, Gilles wrote: On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 16:57:41 +0200, Thomas Neidhart wrote: On 20 Jun 2014 16:37, "Gilles" wrote: On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 16:18:08 +0200, Thomas Neidhart wrote:

Re: [Math] Supported Java versions

2014-06-20 Thread Phil Steitz
On 6/20/14, 9:56 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On 06/20/2014 05:30 PM, Gilles wrote: >> On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 16:57:41 +0200, Thomas Neidhart wrote: >>> On 20 Jun 2014 16:37, "Gilles" wrote: On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 16:18:08 +0200, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > Java 5 is already eol. Anybody still usi

Re: [Math] Supported Java versions

2014-06-20 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 06/20/2014 05:30 PM, Gilles wrote: > On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 16:57:41 +0200, Thomas Neidhart wrote: >> On 20 Jun 2014 16:37, "Gilles" wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 16:18:08 +0200, Thomas Neidhart wrote: Java 5 is already eol. Anybody still using it is certainly in maintenance >>

Re: [Math] Supported Java versions

2014-06-20 Thread venkatesha murthy
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 9:00 PM, Gilles wrote: > On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 16:57:41 +0200, Thomas Neidhart wrote: >> >> On 20 Jun 2014 16:37, "Gilles" wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 16:18:08 +0200, Thomas Neidhart wrote: Java 5 is already eol. Anybody still using it is certainly

Re: [Math] Supported Java versions

2014-06-20 Thread Gilles
On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 16:57:41 +0200, Thomas Neidhart wrote: On 20 Jun 2014 16:37, "Gilles" wrote: On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 16:18:08 +0200, Thomas Neidhart wrote: Java 5 is already eol. Anybody still using it is certainly in maintenance mode thus adding now a feature that is available in java 6 do

Re: [Math] Supported Java versions (Was: svn commit: r1604172 - ...)

2014-06-20 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 20 Jun 2014 16:37, "Gilles" wrote: > > On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 16:18:08 +0200, Thomas Neidhart wrote: >> >> Java 5 is already eol. Anybody still using it is certainly in maintenance >> mode thus adding now a feature that is available in java 6 does not make >> any sense. > > > This a strong stateme

[Math] Supported Java versions (Was: svn commit: r1604172 - ...)

2014-06-20 Thread Gilles
On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 16:18:08 +0200, Thomas Neidhart wrote: Java 5 is already eol. Anybody still using it is certainly in maintenance mode thus adding now a feature that is available in java 6 does not make any sense. This a strong statement in a forum where it has _always_ been indicated that