Re: [Math] MATH-878: Feature request with patch

2012-11-04 Thread Ted Dunning
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: > 0) Did you or anyone else ever analyze the bigram data in the paper > using Fisher's test stats? > That bigram data isn't particularly interesting; any text will show similar effects. Others have tested Fisher's exact test, but only a few ca

Re: [Math] MATH-878: Feature request with patch

2012-11-04 Thread Phil Steitz
On 10/22/12 8:15 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: > On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > >> On 10/21/12 11:25 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: >>> What kind of check did you want? >>> >>> I checked the code by eye and supplied several test cases. You might say >>> that I am versed in statistics sin

Re: [Math] MATH-878: Feature request with patch

2012-10-22 Thread Ted Dunning
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 4:20 AM, Gilles Sadowski < gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:25:08PM -0700, Ted Dunning wrote: > > What kind of check did you want? > > Well, I'm seeking to know whether the code can be included in Commons > Math's > trunk. > Hard for me to

Re: [Math] MATH-878: Feature request with patch

2012-10-22 Thread Ted Dunning
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 10/21/12 11:25 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > > What kind of check did you want? > > > > I checked the code by eye and supplied several test cases. You might say > > that I am versed in statistics since I am the author of the major paper > on >

Re: [Math] MATH-878: Feature request with patch

2012-10-22 Thread Gilles Sadowski
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:25:08PM -0700, Ted Dunning wrote: > What kind of check did you want? Well, I'm seeking to know whether the code can be included in Commons Math's trunk. Currently, the answer is a partial "no" (IMHO), because of the remarks which I formulated on the JIRA page. [If it wer

Re: [Math] MATH-878: Feature request with patch

2012-10-21 Thread Phil Steitz
On 10/21/12 11:25 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > What kind of check did you want? > > I checked the code by eye and supplied several test cases. You might say > that I am versed in statistics since I am the author of the major paper on > this test as applied to computational linguistics. I was going to

Re: [Math] MATH-878: Feature request with patch

2012-10-21 Thread Ted Dunning
What kind of check did you want? I checked the code by eye and supplied several test cases. You might say that I am versed in statistics since I am the author of the major paper on this test as applied to computational linguistics. On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 10/2

Re: [Math] MATH-878: Feature request with patch

2012-10-21 Thread Phil Steitz
On 10/20/12 3:58 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > Hello. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-878 > > Would someone well versed in statistics check that contribution? I wanted to get to this this weekend, but was not able to. I will look at it as soon as I can get some free cycles. Phil

[Math] MATH-878: Feature request with patch

2012-10-20 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hello. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-878 Would someone well versed in statistics check that contribution? Best regards, Gilles - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands