Hi.
> > [...]
> > Yes, but for simple bounds this would not be too much (using a logarithm or
> > exponential).
> > For double bounds, one typically uses a scaled logit function.
> >
> > > If this is the best choice, I'll implement a "conversion" class (for
> > > the
> > > "simple" bound case).
Hi.
> > [Please refer to
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-519
> > for the context of this discussion.]
> >
> > Hi Luc.
> >
> > > Anyway, returning NaN or POSITIVE_INFINITY would work only with
> > some
> > > optimizers.
> >
> > Do you mean that it would fail with some optimizati
Hi Gilles,
- "Gilles Sadowski" a écrit :
> [Please refer to
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-519
> for the context of this discussion.]
>
> Hi Luc.
>
> > Anyway, returning NaN or POSITIVE_INFINITY would work only with
> some
> > optimizers.
>
> Do you mean that it would fail
[Please refer to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-519
for the context of this discussion.]
Hi Luc.
> Anyway, returning NaN or POSITIVE_INFINITY would work only with some
> optimizers.
Do you mean that it would fail with some optimization _algorithms_ or some
unsafe _implementations_
