Re: [Math] MATH-1129 and Re: [MATH-1120] Needed opinion about support on variations in, percentile calculation

2014-06-19 Thread venkatesha murthy
, adjust defaults, check performance ... > Sure, I will come up with this change and propose in a separate thread > I had a difficult day and have a headache right now, so I will not do > the commit just now. I need at least a few more hours to work on it. I > hope to be able to commit something in about 24h, but no promise.

Re: [Math] MATH-1129 and Re: [MATH-1120] Needed opinion about support on variations in, percentile calculation

2014-06-18 Thread Luc Maisonobe
e a first version of your work included in the main repository (with a few changes). Once it's in place, we will continue the discussion and tightening up the remaining loose ends. best regards, Luc > > Thanks for reading this through and for your time in reviewing . > Please

Re: [Math] MATH-1129 and Re: [MATH-1120] Needed opinion about support on variations in, percentile calculation

2014-06-18 Thread venkatesha m
ading this through and for your time in reviewing . Please let me know your opinion on all of these. thanks venkat. On Wed, 18/6/14, Gilles wrote: Subject: Re: [Math] MATH-1129 and Re: [MATH-1120] Needed opinion about support on variations in,

Re: [Math] MATH-1129 and Re: [MATH-1120] Needed opinion about support on variations in, percentile calculation

2014-06-18 Thread Gilles
On Wed, 18 Jun 2014 16:39:12 +0200, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Hi Gilles and Venkat, Le 18/06/2014 15:40, Gilles a écrit : On Wed, 18 Jun 2014 15:02:41 +0200, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Le 18/06/2014 14:32, Gilles a écrit : Hello Luc. See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1129 The problem

Re: [Math] MATH-1129 and Re: [MATH-1120] Needed opinion about support on variations in, percentile calculation

2014-06-18 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Hi Gilles and Venkat, Le 18/06/2014 15:40, Gilles a écrit : > On Wed, 18 Jun 2014 15:02:41 +0200, Luc Maisonobe wrote: >> Le 18/06/2014 14:32, Gilles a écrit : >>> Hello Luc. >>> > > See > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1129 > > The problem reported was due to the

Re: [Math] MATH-1129

2014-06-18 Thread Gilles
On Wed, 18 Jun 2014 15:02:41 +0200, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Le 18/06/2014 14:32, Gilles a écrit : Hello Luc. See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1129 The problem reported was due to the sorting procedure not behaving correctly in the presence of NaN. This procedure could be replace

Re: [Math] MATH-1129

2014-06-18 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 18/06/2014 14:32, Gilles a écrit : > Hello Luc. > >>> >>> See >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1129 >>> >>> The problem reported was due to the sorting procedure not behaving >>> correctly in the presence of NaN. >>> This procedure could be replaced by an equivalent method from

Re: [Math] MATH-1129

2014-06-18 Thread Gilles
Hello Luc. See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1129 The problem reported was due to the sorting procedure not behaving correctly in the presence of NaN. This procedure could be replaced by an equivalent method from the JDK: java.util.Arrays.sort(double[],int,int) Any objectio

Re: [Math] MATH-1129

2014-06-18 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 18/06/2014 13:37, Gilles a écrit : > Hi. Hi Gilles, > > See > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1129 > > The problem reported was due to the sorting procedure not behaving > correctly in the presence of NaN. > This procedure could be replaced by an equivalent method from the JDK:

[Math] MATH-1129

2014-06-18 Thread Gilles
Hi. See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1129 The problem reported was due to the sorting procedure not behaving correctly in the presence of NaN. This procedure could be replaced by an equivalent method from the JDK: java.util.Arrays.sort(double[],int,int) Any objection? Regard