OK. If you want to put the "trivial modifications" that are required so
the code is "on par with what we had usually committed as new
contributions" in the JIRA incident, I can try to address them this week as
well.
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Gilles
wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 19:33:25 +
On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 19:33:25 +0200, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Le 20/10/2014 16:00, Hank Grabowski a écrit :
I have some time this week to try to get these changes made to the
interpolators. I don't want to do anything without consensus
however. So
to try to incorporate the discussion above plus a
Le 20/10/2014 16:00, Hank Grabowski a écrit :
> I have some time this week to try to get these changes made to the
> interpolators. I don't want to do anything without consensus however. So
> to try to incorporate the discussion above plus a concerned raised over the
> weekend on the JIRA thread
I have some time this week to try to get these changes made to the
interpolators. I don't want to do anything without consensus however. So
to try to incorporate the discussion above plus a concerned raised over the
weekend on the JIRA thread I propose:
1. Adding the original functionality back
Hi Hank.
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 11:31:26 -0400, Hank Grabowski wrote:
Gilles,
This is the original changes to get the bicubic spline working. These
were
originally committed as a diff that was attached to the JIRA
incident. The
suggestions in your email were in response to my questions about w
I didn't want to address the situation in my original response since I was
on a smart phone, a bit torqued up by the original e-mail and I didn't want
to further agitate the situation by addressing the original
implementation. Since it seems that's all happened anyway, if you still
want my newbie
Hi all,
Le 17/10/2014 16:23, Gilles a écrit :
> Hi.
>
> On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 10:46:53 +0200, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>> Hi Hank,
>>
>> Le 16/10/2014 20:20, Hank Grabowski a écrit :
>>> OK. I submitted the pull request yesterday. I'm going to now remove
>>> the
>>> diff from JIRA.
>>>
>>> https://gi
Lets calm down, guys. As Luc said, we are experimenting here,
getting the git workflow established. No one is trying to exclude
or discourage anyone. Hank or Luc, can you respond to Gilles'
questions about the commit? If not, it should be reverted, but
hopefully you can all three agree on a way
Gilles,
This is the original changes to get the bicubic spline working. These were
originally committed as a diff that was attached to the JIRA incident. The
suggestions in your email were in response to my questions about work
carrying forward from that point.
I have been very explicit and verb
Hi.
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 10:46:53 +0200, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Hi Hank,
Le 16/10/2014 20:20, Hank Grabowski a écrit :
OK. I submitted the pull request yesterday. I'm going to now
remove the
diff from JIRA.
https://github.com/apache/commons-math/pull/2
Thank you. I have merged this request
10 matches
Mail list logo
