On 10/20/2013 11:34 PM, Gilles wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Oct 2013 22:15:18 +0200, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>> On 10/20/2013 09:56 PM, Gilles wrote:
>>> On Sun, 20 Oct 2013 12:09:44 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 10/20/13 10:44 AM, Gilles wrote:
> Hi.
>
>>>
[...]
>>>
>>> I no
On Sun, 20 Oct 2013 22:15:18 +0200, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
On 10/20/2013 09:56 PM, Gilles wrote:
On Sun, 20 Oct 2013 12:09:44 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 10/20/13 10:44 AM, Gilles wrote:
Hi.
[...]
I notice that you changed back the uppercasing of the "@param"
Javadoc. I've a personal pr
On 10/20/2013 09:56 PM, Gilles wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Oct 2013 12:09:44 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 10/20/13 10:44 AM, Gilles wrote:
>>> Hi.
>>>
>
>> [...]
>
> I notice that you changed back the uppercasing of the "@param"
> Javadoc. I've a personal preference for having an upp
On 10/20/13 12:56 PM, Gilles wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Oct 2013 12:09:44 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 10/20/13 10:44 AM, Gilles wrote:
>>> Hi.
>>>
>
>> [...]
>
> I notice that you changed back the uppercasing of the "@param"
> Javadoc. I've a personal preference for having an upper
On Sun, 20 Oct 2013 12:09:44 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 10/20/13 10:44 AM, Gilles wrote:
Hi.
[...]
I notice that you changed back the uppercasing of the "@param"
Javadoc. I've a personal preference for having an uppercase letter
there, but I'd like that we fix the _project's_ preference.
On 10/20/13 10:44 AM, Gilles wrote:
> Hi.
>
>>>
[...]
>>>
>>> I notice that you changed back the uppercasing of the "@param"
>>> Javadoc. I've a personal preference for having an uppercase letter
>>> there, but I'd like that we fix the _project's_ preference. I
>>> think that is important to h
Hi.
[...]
I notice that you changed back the uppercasing of the "@param"
Javadoc. I've a personal preference for having an uppercase letter
there, but I'd like that we fix the _project's_ preference. I
think that is important to have rules (yes, even trivial ones)
so that people (both commit