On 1/8/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-164 issue presents a
> multiplication case which is neither consistent with double multiplication nor
> compliant to C99. Considering the division case which already handles lots of
> special ca
The https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-164 issue presents a
multiplication case which is neither consistent with double multiplication nor
compliant to C99. Considering the division case which already handles lots of
special cases, I think we should really be C99-compliant for this method.
