, adjust defaults, check performance ...
>
Sure, I will come up with this change and propose in a separate thread
> I had a difficult day and have a headache right now, so I will not do
> the commit just now. I need at least a few more hours to work on it. I
> hope to be able to commit something in about 24h, but no promise.
e a first version of your work
included in the main repository (with a few changes). Once it's in
place, we will continue the discussion and tightening up the remaining
loose ends.
best regards,
Luc
>
> Thanks for reading this through and for your time in reviewing .
> Please
ading this through and for your time in reviewing . Please let me
know your opinion on all of these.
thanks
venkat.
On Wed, 18/6/14, Gilles wrote:
Subject: Re: [Math] MATH-1129 and Re: [MATH-1120] Needed opinion about support
on variations in,
On Wed, 18 Jun 2014 16:39:12 +0200, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Hi Gilles and Venkat,
Le 18/06/2014 15:40, Gilles a écrit :
On Wed, 18 Jun 2014 15:02:41 +0200, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Le 18/06/2014 14:32, Gilles a écrit :
Hello Luc.
See
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1129
The problem
Hi Gilles and Venkat,
Le 18/06/2014 15:40, Gilles a écrit :
> On Wed, 18 Jun 2014 15:02:41 +0200, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>> Le 18/06/2014 14:32, Gilles a écrit :
>>> Hello Luc.
>>>
>
> See
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1129
>
> The problem reported was due to the
All comments are incorporated except for type 10 of wkipedia as i couldnt
get a comparing tool to provide.
I have also added min and maxLimits to javadoc.
Please let know.
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 6:27 PM, venkatesha murthy <
venkateshamurth...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 4:1
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Gilles
wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 20:03:57 +0800 (SGT), venkatesha m wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I am looking for opinion on the name of the enum for the various
>> estimation strategies.
>> This is a public static enum under Percentile and i wish to call it
>> Est
On Wed, 11 Jun 2014 11:50:13 +0100, Schalk W. Cronjé wrote:
As a consumer of the library I'll have no idea what R_1 means. Even
if I
know what is is, I might have forgotten what it is at the time of
usage, so
a mental reminder might be useful. At the minimum the javadoc should
refer
to the lin
As a consumer of the library I'll have no idea what R_1 means. Even if I
know what is is, I might have forgotten what it is at the time of usage, so
a mental reminder might be useful. At the minimum the javadoc should refer
to the link you have shown.
Even better if you rather use something like I
On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 20:03:57 +0800 (SGT), venkatesha m wrote:
Hi All,
I am looking for opinion on the name of the enum for the various
estimation strategies.
This is a public static enum under Percentile and i wish to call it
EstimationTecnique.
Would appreciate if you can provide feedback on the
patch attached to MATH-1120 (percentile-wth-estimation-patch) for
the reference.
thanks
venkat.
On Mon, 2/6/14, venkatesha murthy wrote:
Subject: Re: [MATH-1120] Needed opinion about support on variations in
percentile calculation
To: "Co
I have gone through Wikipedia and R functions to get an understanding.
My idea is to come up with different estimation techniques as strategies
(Enums) and constrction inject during percentile object creation.
The evaluate method could then use this estimation tecnhique to complete
the computation
All,
Agreed and thanks for opinionating..
I will work through this to get up with a draft design on the same and
propse for review in some time.
Thanks
Venkat.
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 2:27 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 5/21/14, 1:43 PM, Gilles wrote:
> > On Wed, 21 May 2014 13:16:26 -0700, Phil
On 5/21/14, 1:43 PM, Gilles wrote:
> On Wed, 21 May 2014 13:16:26 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 5/21/14, 12:18 PM, venkatesha murthy wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> The existing Percentile class calculates the percentile based on
>>> the
>>> quantile position of the array fixed as
>>> p * (N+1)/100 fo
On Wed, 21 May 2014 13:16:26 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 5/21/14, 12:18 PM, venkatesha murthy wrote:
Hi All,
The existing Percentile class calculates the percentile based on the
quantile position of the array fixed as
p * (N+1)/100 for a pth Percentile on an Array of size N. However if
we
we
On 5/21/14, 12:18 PM, venkatesha murthy wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The existing Percentile class calculates the percentile based on the
> quantile position of the array fixed as
> p * (N+1)/100 for a pth Percentile on an Array of size N. However if we
> were to add these numbers in MS Excel
> to calculat
-Original Message-
From: venkatesha murthy [mailto:venkateshamurth...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 3:18 PM
To: dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: [MATH-1120] Needed opinion about support on variations in percentile
calculation
Hi All,
The existing Percentile class calculates the
Hi All,
The existing Percentile class calculates the percentile based on the
quantile position of the array fixed as
p * (N+1)/100 for a pth Percentile on an Array of size N. However if we
were to add these numbers in MS Excel
to calculate the percentile it provides a different result and closely
Hi All,
The existing Percentile class calculates the percentile based on the quantile
position of the array fixed as
p * (N+1)/100 for a pth Percentile on an Array of size N. However if we were to
add these numbers in MS Excel
to calculate the percentile it provides a different result and clos
19 matches
Mail list logo
