John Bollinger wrote:
>
>
> sebb wrote:
>> Below is a sample of how we might proceed with the removal of
>> Serializable from implementations.
>>
>> Feedback please!
>
> [...]
>
>> /** Serializable version identifier. */
>> private static final long serialVersionUID = -20361316980311
On 22/05/2009, John Bollinger wrote:
>
>
> sebb wrote:
> > Below is a sample of how we might proceed with the removal of
> > Serializable from implementations.
> >
> > Feedback please!
>
>
> [...]
>
>
> > /** Serializable version identifier. */
> > private static final long serial
sebb wrote:
> Below is a sample of how we might proceed with the removal of
> Serializable from implementations.
>
> Feedback please!
[...]
> /** Serializable version identifier. */
> private static final long serialVersionUID = -2036131698031167221L;
I strongly recommend using small
On 22/05/2009, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> sebb AT ASF a écrit :
>
> > Below is a sample of how we might proceed with the removal of
> > Serializable from implementations.
> >
> > Feedback please!
>
>
> This is fine to me.
I just realised that the new release is 2.0, not 3.3!
So the comment in the
sebb AT ASF a écrit :
> Below is a sample of how we might proceed with the removal of
> Serializable from implementations.
>
> Feedback please!
This is fine to me.
Luc
>
> On 22/05/2009, s...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: sebb
>> Date: Fri May 22 12:58:26 2009
>> New Revision: 777501
>>
>>
Below is a sample of how we might proceed with the removal of
Serializable from implementations.
Feedback please!
On 22/05/2009, s...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: sebb
> Date: Fri May 22 12:58:26 2009
> New Revision: 777501
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=777501&view=rev
> Log:
> M
