Re: [MATH] Jenkins unit test failure

2015-01-13 Thread Phil Steitz
On 1/13/15 2:33 PM, sebb wrote: > On 13 January 2015 at 21:26, Thomas Neidhart > wrote: >> On 01/13/2015 09:01 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: >>> On 1/12/15 3:21 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: On 01/12/2015 11:17 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 1/12/15 2:30 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: >> On 01/12/201

Re: [MATH] Jenkins unit test failure

2015-01-13 Thread Gilles
Hi. [...] Everytime I added more debug output to FastMath.exp(), the tests succeeded. Did you try using Math.exp or StrictMath.exp in place of FastMath.exp? I also setup a jenkins instance with the same maven / jdk version to build commons-math, but could never reproduce an error so far.

Re: [MATH] Jenkins unit test failure

2015-01-13 Thread sebb
On 13 January 2015 at 21:26, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On 01/13/2015 09:01 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: >> On 1/12/15 3:21 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: >>> On 01/12/2015 11:17 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: On 1/12/15 2:30 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On 01/12/2015 10:26 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: >>

Re: [MATH] Jenkins unit test failure

2015-01-13 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 01/13/2015 09:01 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 1/12/15 3:21 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: >> On 01/12/2015 11:17 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: >>> On 1/12/15 2:30 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: On 01/12/2015 10:26 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On 01/12/2015 08:09 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: >> On 1/12/15

Re: [MATH] Jenkins unit test failure

2015-01-13 Thread Phil Steitz
On 1/12/15 3:21 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On 01/12/2015 11:17 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: >> On 1/12/15 2:30 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: >>> On 01/12/2015 10:26 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: On 01/12/2015 08:09 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 1/12/15 11:37 AM, sebb wrote: >> On 12 January 2015 a

Re: [MATH] Jenkins unit test failure

2015-01-13 Thread Thomas Neidhart
jacoco is not the cause as the tests still fail when it is disabled. Thomas On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > I did several tests by adding additional console output. > The build was always running on H11 and sometimes it was working, while in > other cases not. > > Ins

Re: [MATH] Jenkins unit test failure

2015-01-13 Thread Thomas Neidhart
I did several tests by adding additional console output. The build was always running on H11 and sometimes it was working, while in other cases not. Inspecting the byte code did not show anything unusual, it looks correct. Maybe it is related to jacoco, as it adds a javaagent which manipulates byt

Re: [MATH] Jenkins unit test failure

2015-01-12 Thread sebb
On 13 January 2015 at 01:12, sebb wrote: > On 13 January 2015 at 00:53, Phil Steitz wrote: >> On 1/12/15 5:44 PM, sebb wrote: >>> On 12 January 2015 at 22:21, Thomas Neidhart >>> wrote: On 01/12/2015 11:17 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 1/12/15 2:30 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: >> On 01

Re: [MATH] Jenkins unit test failure

2015-01-12 Thread sebb
On 13 January 2015 at 00:53, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 1/12/15 5:44 PM, sebb wrote: >> On 12 January 2015 at 22:21, Thomas Neidhart >> wrote: >>> On 01/12/2015 11:17 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: On 1/12/15 2:30 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On 01/12/2015 10:26 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: >> O

Re: [MATH] Jenkins unit test failure

2015-01-12 Thread Phil Steitz
On 1/12/15 5:44 PM, sebb wrote: > On 12 January 2015 at 22:21, Thomas Neidhart > wrote: >> On 01/12/2015 11:17 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: >>> On 1/12/15 2:30 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: On 01/12/2015 10:26 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On 01/12/2015 08:09 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: >> On 1/12/

Re: [MATH] Jenkins unit test failure

2015-01-12 Thread sebb
On 12 January 2015 at 22:21, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On 01/12/2015 11:17 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: >> On 1/12/15 2:30 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: >>> On 01/12/2015 10:26 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: On 01/12/2015 08:09 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 1/12/15 11:37 AM, sebb wrote: >> On 12 Janu

Re: [MATH] Jenkins unit test failure

2015-01-12 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 01/12/2015 11:17 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 1/12/15 2:30 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: >> On 01/12/2015 10:26 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: >>> On 01/12/2015 08:09 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: On 1/12/15 11:37 AM, sebb wrote: > On 12 January 2015 at 18:11, Phil Steitz wrote: >> On 1/12/15 10:

Re: [MATH] Jenkins unit test failure

2015-01-12 Thread Phil Steitz
On 1/12/15 2:30 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On 01/12/2015 10:26 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: >> On 01/12/2015 08:09 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: >>> On 1/12/15 11:37 AM, sebb wrote: On 12 January 2015 at 18:11, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 1/12/15 10:50 AM, sebb wrote: >> On 11 January 2015 at 22

Re: [MATH] Jenkins unit test failure

2015-01-12 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 01/12/2015 10:26 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On 01/12/2015 08:09 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: >> On 1/12/15 11:37 AM, sebb wrote: >>> On 12 January 2015 at 18:11, Phil Steitz wrote: On 1/12/15 10:50 AM, sebb wrote: > On 11 January 2015 at 22:10, Phil Steitz wrote: >> On 1/11/15 11:19 A

Re: [MATH] Jenkins unit test failure

2015-01-12 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 01/12/2015 08:09 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 1/12/15 11:37 AM, sebb wrote: >> On 12 January 2015 at 18:11, Phil Steitz wrote: >>> On 1/12/15 10:50 AM, sebb wrote: On 11 January 2015 at 22:10, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 1/11/15 11:19 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: >> On 1/10/15 10:49 PM, Phil

Re: [MATH] Jenkins unit test failure

2015-01-12 Thread Phil Steitz
On 1/12/15 11:37 AM, sebb wrote: > On 12 January 2015 at 18:11, Phil Steitz wrote: >> On 1/12/15 10:50 AM, sebb wrote: >>> On 11 January 2015 at 22:10, Phil Steitz wrote: On 1/11/15 11:19 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 1/10/15 10:49 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: >> On 1/9/15 6:09 PM, sebb wrot

Re: [MATH] Jenkins unit test failure

2015-01-12 Thread sebb
On 12 January 2015 at 18:11, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 1/12/15 10:50 AM, sebb wrote: >> On 11 January 2015 at 22:10, Phil Steitz wrote: >>> On 1/11/15 11:19 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: On 1/10/15 10:49 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 1/9/15 6:09 PM, sebb wrote: >> On 10 January 2015 at 01:01, P

Re: [MATH] Jenkins unit test failure

2015-01-12 Thread Phil Steitz
On 1/12/15 10:50 AM, sebb wrote: > On 11 January 2015 at 22:10, Phil Steitz wrote: >> On 1/11/15 11:19 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: >>> On 1/10/15 10:49 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: On 1/9/15 6:09 PM, sebb wrote: > On 10 January 2015 at 01:01, Phil Steitz wrote: >> On 1/9/15 5:32 PM, sebb wrote:

Re: [MATH] Jenkins unit test failure

2015-01-12 Thread sebb
On 11 January 2015 at 22:10, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 1/11/15 11:19 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: >> On 1/10/15 10:49 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: >>> On 1/9/15 6:09 PM, sebb wrote: On 10 January 2015 at 01:01, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 1/9/15 5:32 PM, sebb wrote: >> On 9 January 2015 at 23:48, sebb

Re: [MATH] Jenkins unit test failure

2015-01-12 Thread sebb
On 11 January 2015 at 18:19, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 1/10/15 10:49 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: >> On 1/9/15 6:09 PM, sebb wrote: >>> On 10 January 2015 at 01:01, Phil Steitz wrote: On 1/9/15 5:32 PM, sebb wrote: > On 9 January 2015 at 23:48, sebb wrote: >> Of the last 6 runs, only 1 had

Re: [MATH] Jenkins unit test failure

2015-01-11 Thread Phil Steitz
On 1/11/15 11:19 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 1/10/15 10:49 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: >> On 1/9/15 6:09 PM, sebb wrote: >>> On 10 January 2015 at 01:01, Phil Steitz wrote: On 1/9/15 5:32 PM, sebb wrote: > On 9 January 2015 at 23:48, sebb wrote: >> Of the last 6 runs, only 1 had a problem

Re: [MATH] Jenkins unit test failure

2015-01-11 Thread Phil Steitz
On 1/10/15 10:49 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 1/9/15 6:09 PM, sebb wrote: >> On 10 January 2015 at 01:01, Phil Steitz wrote: >>> On 1/9/15 5:32 PM, sebb wrote: On 9 January 2015 at 23:48, sebb wrote: > Of the last 6 runs, only 1 had a problem with unit test failures. > > All the b

Re: [MATH] Jenkins unit test failure

2015-01-10 Thread Phil Steitz
On 1/9/15 6:09 PM, sebb wrote: > On 10 January 2015 at 01:01, Phil Steitz wrote: >> On 1/9/15 5:32 PM, sebb wrote: >>> On 9 January 2015 at 23:48, sebb wrote: Of the last 6 runs, only 1 had a problem with unit test failures. All the builds ran on ubuntu3, apart from the failure whi

Re: [MATH] Jenkins unit test failure

2015-01-09 Thread sebb
On 10 January 2015 at 01:01, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 1/9/15 5:32 PM, sebb wrote: >> On 9 January 2015 at 23:48, sebb wrote: >>> Of the last 6 runs, only 1 had a problem with unit test failures. >>> >>> All the builds ran on ubuntu3, apart from the failure which ran on H10. >>> This may have some

Re: [MATH] Jenkins unit test failure

2015-01-09 Thread Phil Steitz
On 1/9/15 5:32 PM, sebb wrote: > On 9 January 2015 at 23:48, sebb wrote: >> Of the last 6 runs, only 1 had a problem with unit test failures. >> >> All the builds ran on ubuntu3, apart from the failure which ran on H10. >> This may have some bearing on the result; I don't yet know. >> >> I had a q

Re: [MATH] Jenkins unit test failure

2015-01-09 Thread sebb
On 9 January 2015 at 23:48, sebb wrote: > Of the last 6 runs, only 1 had a problem with unit test failures. > > All the builds ran on ubuntu3, apart from the failure which ran on H10. > This may have some bearing on the result; I don't yet know. > > I had a quick look at 2 tests that failed: > > S

[MATH] Jenkins unit test failure

2015-01-09 Thread sebb
Of the last 6 runs, only 1 had a problem with unit test failures. All the builds ran on ubuntu3, apart from the failure which ran on H10. This may have some bearing on the result; I don't yet know. I had a quick look at 2 tests that failed: SimpleRegressionTest.testPerfect SimpleRegressionTest.