Re: [MATH] FastMath evaluation discrepancies

2011-01-24 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Hi Sebb, Le 24/01/2011 18:59, sebb a écrit : > I've now fixed the reflection-based tests. Great. I didn't knew about this way to use junit. > > Rather than ignoring results which are within one ULP of the expected > value, these are treated as errors at present. > If double or float numbers dif

Re: [MATH] FastMath evaluation discrepancies

2011-01-24 Thread sebb
On 24 January 2011 17:59, sebb wrote: > I've now fixed the reflection-based tests. > > Rather than ignoring results which are within one ULP of the expected > value, these are treated as errors at present. > If double or float numbers differ, these are now shown in hex, rather > than floating-poin

[MATH] FastMath evaluation discrepancies

2011-01-24 Thread sebb
I've now fixed the reflection-based tests. Rather than ignoring results which are within one ULP of the expected value, these are treated as errors at present. If double or float numbers differ, these are now shown in hex, rather than floating-point as many of the routines use bit operations anywa