On 2 October 2010 15:08, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 10/1/10 10:52 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>>
>> Le 01/10/2010 16:34, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 03:17:58PM +0100, sebb wrote:
There are quite a few test cases that have code like:
public void testSomet
On 10/1/10 10:52 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Le 01/10/2010 16:34, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 03:17:58PM +0100, sebb wrote:
There are quite a few test cases that have code like:
public void testSomething(){
try {
something();
fail("an exception should have
Le 01/10/2010 16:34, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
> On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 03:17:58PM +0100, sebb wrote:
>> There are quite a few test cases that have code like:
>>
>> public void testSomething(){
>> try {
>> something();
>> fail("an exception should have been caught");
>> } catch
On 1 October 2010 15:34, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 03:17:58PM +0100, sebb wrote:
>> There are quite a few test cases that have code like:
>>
>> public void testSomething(){
>> try {
>> something();
>> fail("an exception should have been caught");
>> } cat
On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 03:17:58PM +0100, sebb wrote:
> There are quite a few test cases that have code like:
>
> public void testSomething(){
> try {
> something();
> fail("an exception should have been caught");
> } catch (EstimationException ee) {
> // expected behavio
There are quite a few test cases that have code like:
public void testSomething(){
try {
something();
fail("an exception should have been caught");
} catch (EstimationException ee) {
// expected behavior
} catch (Exception e) {
fail("wrong exception type caught"
