Re: [ANNOUNCE] - Apache Commons Launcher moved to dormant

2017-09-24 Thread Pascal Schumacher
Am 24.09.2017 um 18:31 schrieb sebb: The document is missing a step (just added). Thanks! I have added the same redirects for commons discovery. Cheers, Pascal - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For

Re: [ANNOUNCE] - Apache Commons Launcher moved to dormant

2017-09-24 Thread sebb
On 24 September 2017 at 13:35, Pascal Schumacher wrote: > Am 24.09.2017 um 14:31 schrieb sebb: >>> >>> to: >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/dormant/launcher >>> >>> Synchronization of the git mirror >>> (git://git.apache.or

Re: [ANNOUNCE] - Apache Commons Launcher moved to dormant

2017-09-24 Thread Pascal Schumacher
Am 24.09.2017 um 14:31 schrieb sebb: to: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/dormant/launcher Synchronization of the git mirror (git://git.apache.org/commons-launcher.git) has been deactivated. The website has moved from: http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-launcher/ There ought to

Re: [ANNOUNCE] - Apache Commons Launcher moved to dormant

2017-09-24 Thread sebb
On 24 September 2017 at 13:12, Pascal Schumacher wrote: > Hi, > > since no development has happened for a long while, the Apache Commons > Launcher component > has been moved to dormant. No further development is expected. > > The SVN location has changed from: > https://

[ANNOUNCE] - Apache Commons Launcher moved to dormant

2017-09-24 Thread Pascal Schumacher
Hi, since no development has happened for a long while, the Apache Commons Launcher component has been moved to dormant. No further development is expected. The SVN location has changed from: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/launcher to: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons

[RESULT] [VOTE] Move Apache Commons Launcher to dormant?

2017-08-26 Thread Pascal Schumacher
Time to wrap up. The following votes were cast (in order of appearance): Rob Tompkins: +1 Gary Gregory: +1 Agustín Bernal Fernando: +1 (non-binding) Amey Jadiye: +1 (non-binding) Bernd Eckenfels: +1 Ralph Goers: +1 Benedikt Ritter: +1 Pascal Schumacher: +1 The vote has passed. Thanks to all the

Re: [VOTE] Move Apache Commons Launcher to dormant?

2017-08-26 Thread Pascal Schumacher
+1 Am 21.08.2017 um 08:30 schrieb Benedikt Ritter: +1 Am 20.08.2017 um 12:11 schrieb Pascal Schumacher : Hi all, as discussed, I'd like to propose to move Apache Commons Launcher to dormant. Reasons: - The last release is from 2007. - No bugfix or feature addition commits since 2007

Re: [VOTE] Move Apache Commons Launcher to dormant?

2017-08-20 Thread Benedikt Ritter
+1 > Am 20.08.2017 um 12:11 schrieb Pascal Schumacher : > > Hi all, > > as discussed, I'd like to propose to move Apache Commons Launcher to dormant. > > Reasons: > - The last release is from 2007. > - No bugfix or feature addition commits since 2007. >

Re: [VOTE] Move Apache Commons Launcher to dormant?

2017-08-20 Thread Ralph Goers
+1 Ralph > On Aug 20, 2017, at 3:11 AM, Pascal Schumacher > wrote: > > Hi all, > > as discussed, I'd like to propose to move Apache Commons Launcher to dormant. > > Reasons: > - The last release is from 2007. > - No bugfix or feature addition commits s

Re: [VOTE] Move Apache Commons Launcher to dormant?

2017-08-20 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
+1 Gruss Bernd -- http://bernd.eckenfels.net On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Pascal Schumacher mailto:pascalschumac...@gmx.net> wrote: > Hi all, > > as discussed, I'd like to propose to move Apache Commons Launcher to > dormant. > > Reasons: > - The last release i

Re: [VOTE] Move Apache Commons Launcher to dormant?

2017-08-20 Thread Amey Jadiye
+1 On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Pascal Schumacher wrote: > Hi all, > > as discussed, I'd like to propose to move Apache Commons Launcher to > dormant. > > Reasons: > - The last release is from 2007. > - No bugfix or feature addition commits since 2007. > >

Re: [VOTE] Move Apache Commons Launcher to dormant?

2017-08-20 Thread Agustín Bernal Fernando
+1 On Sun, Aug 20, 2017, 6:44 AM Gary Gregory wrote: > +1 > > Gary > > On Aug 20, 2017 04:12, "Pascal Schumacher" > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > as discussed, I'd like to propose to move Apache Commons Launcher to > > dormant. &g

Re: [VOTE] Move Apache Commons Launcher to dormant?

2017-08-20 Thread Gary Gregory
+1 Gary On Aug 20, 2017 04:12, "Pascal Schumacher" wrote: > Hi all, > > as discussed, I'd like to propose to move Apache Commons Launcher to > dormant. > > Reasons: > - The last release is from 2007. > - No bugfix or feature addition commits since 2007

Re: [VOTE] Move Apache Commons Launcher to dormant?

2017-08-20 Thread Rob Tompkins
+1 > On Aug 20, 2017, at 6:11 AM, Pascal Schumacher > wrote: > > Hi all, > > as discussed, I'd like to propose to move Apache Commons Launcher to dormant. > > Reasons: > - The last release is from 2007. > - No bugfix or feature addition commits since 2

[VOTE] Move Apache Commons Launcher to dormant?

2017-08-20 Thread Pascal Schumacher
Hi all, as discussed, I'd like to propose to move Apache Commons Launcher to dormant. Reasons: - The last release is from 2007. - No bugfix or feature addition commits since 2007. So please cast your votes: This vote will close no sooner that 72 hours from now, i.e. after 13:00CET 23 A

Re: [launcher] Move to dormant?

2017-08-13 Thread Gilles
Hello. On Sun, 13 Aug 2017 20:42:34 +0200, Pascal Schumacher wrote: Hello everybody, an opinions on moving commons-launcher to dormant? The last release is from 2007 and their have not been any bugfix or feature addition commits since. It might be interesting to know the reason for the

Re: [launcher] Move to dormant?

2017-08-13 Thread Stian Soiland-Reyes
On 13 Aug 2017 7:43 pm, "Pascal Schumacher" wrote: Hello everybody, an opinions on moving commons-launcher to dormant? The last release is from 2007 and their have not been any bugfix or feature addition commits since. +1

Re: [launcher] Move to dormant?

2017-08-13 Thread Gary Gregory
Ok here. Gary On Aug 13, 2017 12:43, "Pascal Schumacher" wrote: > Hello everybody, > > an opinions on moving commons-launcher to dormant? > > The last release is from 2007 and their have not been any bugfix or > feature addition commits s

[launcher] Move to dormant?

2017-08-13 Thread Pascal Schumacher
Hello everybody, an opinions on moving commons-launcher to dormant? The last release is from 2007 and their have not been any bugfix or feature addition commits since. Cheers, Psacal - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr

Re: Analysis of commons-jelly-1.0 & commons-launcher-1.1 dependencies on JDK-Internal APIs

2014-10-17 Thread dalibor topic
red guidance on migrating some of the more common usage patterns of JDK-internal APIs to supported public interfaces. The list is on the OpenJDK wiki [0], along with instructions on how to run the jdeps analysis tool yourself . I have prepared reports , attached to this email, for commons-jelly-1.

Re: Analysis of commons-jelly-1.0 & commons-launcher-1.1 dependencies on JDK-Internal APIs

2014-10-17 Thread Paul Libbrecht
al APIs >>> to supported public interfaces. The list is on the OpenJDK wiki [0], along >>> with instructions on how to run the jdeps analysis tool yourself . >>> >>> I have prepared reports , attached to this email, for commons-jelly-1.0 & >>> common

Re: Analysis of commons-jelly-1.0 & commons-launcher-1.1 dependencies on JDK-Internal APIs

2014-10-17 Thread Rory O'Donnell
commons-launcher attached. Rgds,Rory On 17/10/2014 19:22, Paul Libbrecht wrote: Rory, I see no attachments here. Can you post it to some web-place please? paul On 17 oct. 2014, at 10:42, Rory O'Donnell wrote: Hi Benedict, As I already mentioned we have prepared guidance on migr

Re: Analysis of commons-jelly-1.0 & commons-launcher-1.1 dependencies on JDK-Internal APIs

2014-10-17 Thread Rory O'Donnell
y-1.0 & commons-launcher-1.1 based on the jdeps output. For anything where your migration path is unclear, I would appreciate comments on the JDK-internal API usage patterns in the attached jdeps reports - in particular comments elaborating on the rationale for them - either to me or on the

Re: Analysis of commons-jelly-1.0 & commons-launcher-1.1 dependencies on JDK-Internal APIs

2014-10-17 Thread Paul Libbrecht
Is > to supported public interfaces. The list is on the OpenJDK wiki [0], along > with instructions on how to run the jdeps analysis tool yourself . > > I have prepared reports , attached to this email, for commons-jelly-1.0 & > commons-launcher-1.1 based on the jdeps output. &g

Analysis of commons-jelly-1.0 & commons-launcher-1.1 dependencies on JDK-Internal APIs

2014-10-17 Thread Rory O'Donnell
reports , attached to this email, for commons-jelly-1.0 & commons-launcher-1.1 based on the jdeps output. For anything where your migration path is unclear, I would appreciate comments on the JDK-internal API usage patterns in the attached jdeps reports - in particular comments elaboratin

Re: svn commit: r1557338 - in /commons/proper/exec/trunk/src: main/java/org/apache/commons/exec/ main/java/org/apache/commons/exec/environment/ main/java/org/apache/commons/exec/launcher/ main/java/or

2014-01-11 Thread Benedikt Ritter
mentUtils.java > > commons/proper/exec/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/exec/environment/OpenVmsProcessingEnvironment.java > > commons/proper/exec/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/exec/launcher/CommandLauncher.java > > commons/proper/exec/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/com

Re: [Launcher] [Exec] Merge Proposal

2013-06-16 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 16/06/2013 14:15, Ricardo Espírito Santo a écrit : > Please let me know what you think so that I can start getting my hands onto > the actual job itself. -0 I don't find the [launcher] strategy for starting processes very appealing and I fear this will just bring unnecessary blo

Re: [Launcher] [Exec] Merge Proposal

2013-06-16 Thread Ricardo Espírito Santo
ed on his last message. [Exec] is a broader project and it seems to make sense to integrate [Launcher] into it. Even if we call the final product something else. I thought that a good point for integration could be a non disruptive approach by simply implementing the LauncherBootstrap ([Lau

Re: [Launcher] [Exec] Merge Proposal

2013-06-10 Thread Siegfried Goeschl
Hi folks, had a quick look * similar functionality of both components * launcher has some bells and whistles regarding launching Java processes compared to commons-exec * commons-launcher has Ant dependencies IMHO retiring commons-launcher and moving it to commons-exec is a good idea

Re: [Launcher] [Exec] Merge Proposal

2013-06-10 Thread Siegfried Goeschl
Hi folks, there is actually "launcher" code in commons-exec - see org.apache.commons.exec.launcher I'm having a look "Launcher" code this evening Cheers, Siegfried Goeschl On 10.06.13 12:07, Ricardo Espírito Santo wrote: Hi Emmanuel, Thank you for your comments.

Re: [Launcher] [Exec] Merge Proposal

2013-06-10 Thread Ricardo Espírito Santo
ternal application from Java > launcher: Start a Java application from the shell > > Besides launching something they don't look that similar to me. > That's a very good similarity! They both launch something and since that is 99% of what they do I'd say they do pretty m

Re: [Launcher] [Exec] Merge Proposal

2013-06-09 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 09/06/2013 22:03, Ricardo Espírito Santo a écrit : > - Very similar objectives, features and aims exec: Invoke an external application from Java launcher: Start a Java application from the shell Besides launching something they don't look that similar to me. > - Simplifica

[Launcher] [Exec] Merge Proposal

2013-06-09 Thread Ricardo Espírito Santo
Hi all, Following an initial idea of Gary Gregory, I have written a small proposal regarding the merge of Launcher and Exec. If this idea gains enough momentum I shall devise a plan and continue with the rest of the required work. Please comment and vote for merge +1 or no merge -1

Re: [Launcher]

2013-06-06 Thread Gary Gregory
ricardoespsa...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > Ok a bit more educated about the [exec] project now and yes I do > > believe > > > > [exec] is sort of too small to be left on its own. > > > > > > > > I liked the idea of merging it into

Re: [Launcher]

2013-06-06 Thread Ricardo Espírito Santo
k a bit more educated about the [exec] project now and yes I do > believe > > > [exec] is sort of too small to be left on its own. > > > > > > I liked the idea of merging it into [launcher] or the other way around > > but > > > then I liked your next idea

Re: [Launcher]

2013-06-05 Thread Gary Gregory
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 6:11 PM, sebb wrote: > On 5 June 2013 22:53, Ricardo Espírito Santo > wrote: > > Ok a bit more educated about the [exec] project now and yes I do believe > > [exec] is sort of too small to be left on its own. > > > > I liked the idea of mer

Re: [Launcher]

2013-06-05 Thread sebb
On 5 June 2013 22:53, Ricardo Espírito Santo wrote: > Ok a bit more educated about the [exec] project now and yes I do believe > [exec] is sort of too small to be left on its own. > > I liked the idea of merging it into [launcher] or the other way around but > then I liked your

Re: [Launcher]

2013-06-05 Thread Ricardo Espírito Santo
Ok a bit more educated about the [exec] project now and yes I do believe [exec] is sort of too small to be left on its own. I liked the idea of merging it into [launcher] or the other way around but then I liked your next idea even better merging them both into [lang] ... However, on a second

Re: [Launcher]

2013-06-05 Thread Ricardo Espírito Santo
action since two years or > so... > > > > So I guess my real question now is 'Is it possible to retake control of a > > project which has been left semi-abandoned?' > > > > Yes, development is based on contributions from the community. > > WRT [launc

Re: [Launcher]

2013-06-04 Thread Gary Gregory
action since two years or so... > > So I guess my real question now is 'Is it possible to retake control of a > project which has been left semi-abandoned?' > Yes, development is based on contributions from the community. WRT [launcher], I wonder if we could merge it with [e

Re: [Launcher]

2013-06-04 Thread Ricardo Espírito Santo
Hi Gary, Thanks for your reply! I kinda was expecting that answer but I'm sort of curious as to what happens to a project that gets no love from anyone for a long while? The reason I'm asking this is that I have been buzzing around the commons projects for a few days trying to find something I c

Re: [Launcher]

2013-06-04 Thread Gary Gregory
Hi, No one is "in charge" of any Commons component. The community develops and supports Commons as each participant and member sees fit. Gary On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Ricardo Espírito Santo < ricardoespsa...@gmail.com> wrote: > Is there anyone in charge of this project? > > Thanks, > Ri

[Launcher]

2013-06-04 Thread Ricardo Espírito Santo
Is there anyone in charge of this project? Thanks, Ricardo Espírito Santo

Using Apache Launcher to start a java method as a separate child process

2010-01-18 Thread Lahiru Gunathilake
Hi devs, I like to know whether the $subject is possible with Apache Launcher ? If I have a particular method I want to start as a separate child process of my parent process how I am suppose to use Launcher class in apache Launcher. I don't want to use any ant script or anything my requir

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-launcher (in module apache-commons) failed

2008-06-19 Thread Stefan Bodewig
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-launcher has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-launcher (in module apache-commons) failed

2008-02-05 Thread Stefan Bodewig
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-launcher has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

Re: [Launcher] Still Active?

2007-12-28 Thread Matt Benson
far. Anyway, the situation I've described applies precisely for me in this instance; I actually have looked at your patches, but simply have not had the time to do more than that. You should indeed feel free to nag the list periodically in case someone has had some time open up and forgot

Re: [Launcher] Still Active?

2007-12-28 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 12/28/07, Mark Horn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Rahul, > > Thanks for the links. I have reviewed them in the past, but will do so again. > I doubt anything has changed, if you've seen them, you're upto speed :-) > I did attach a patch file w/ my requested change in JIRA and reviewing > Lau

Re: [Launcher] Still Active?

2007-12-28 Thread Mark Horn
olkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12/28/07, Mark Horn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is Commons-Launcher still active? The last release appears to be > > quite some time ago ( Jan. 2005 ) and issues/feature requests have > > been logged into JIRA (including one by

Re: [Launcher] Still Active?

2007-12-28 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 12/28/07, Mark Horn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is Commons-Launcher still active? The last release appears to be > quite some time ago ( Jan. 2005 ) and issues/feature requests have > been logged into JIRA (including one by myself) but there does not > seem to be any activ

[Launcher] Still Active?

2007-12-28 Thread Mark Horn
Is Commons-Launcher still active? The last release appears to be quite some time ago ( Jan. 2005 ) and issues/feature requests have been logged into JIRA (including one by myself) but there does not seem to be any activity on the project what so ever. Is there a better alternative to commons