subject:"\[LANG\]commons Lang\-288"

Re: [LANG]commons Lang-288

2010-02-07 Thread Henri Yandell

I disagree on your doubt, but have other doubts. Think of this issue as a TODO in the code (I think it came from a TODO file a long time back). I think it's doable with a StrMatcher change - moving it back to 3.0 because while it shouldn't break the StrTokenizer API, it will need to break the StrMa

[LANG]commons Lang-288

2010-02-07 Thread Chandra Shekar

Hi Can any body clarify my doubt on issue LANG-288; I have added my comments in it. Thanks Chandrashekar